I think I favor "20th century Haskell" myself :-) Hassett wrote: > > On 9/8/98 5:10 PM, Andrew Rock wrote > > >If Standard Haskell is meant to be a stable target for texts and the like, > >why not Haskell-Ed (for Education), perhaps with a version indication like > >Haskell-Ed-98. > > Unfortunately, this carries the risk that the uninformed may think that > the > language was named after Eddie "That's a very nice sweater, Mrs. Cleaver" > Haskell. > > - Jim Hassett
- Re: Standard Haskell Stephen H. Price
- Re: Standard Haskell Hans Aberg
- Re: Standard Haskell Paul Hudak
- Re: Standard Haskell Joe Fasel
- Re: Standard Haskell Greg Michaelson
- Re: Standard Haskell Dave Parrott 0171 542 9830
- Re: Standard Haskell Arthur Gold
- Re: Standard Haskell Andrew Rock
- Re: Standard Haskell Wolfram Kahl
- Re: Standard Haskell Hassett
- Re: Standard Haskell John Launchbury
- Re: Standard Haskell Rob Ballantyne
- Re: Standard Haskell Alex Ferguson