Naw. Let's go for "Haskell 00". ;-) --Joe Joseph H. Fasel, Ph.D. email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Technology Modeling and Analysis phone: +1 505 667 7158 University of California fax: +1 505 667 2960 Los Alamos National Laboratory postal: TSA-7 MS F609 Los Alamos, NM 87545 | Haskell 98 (or 99) sounds just right to me. Please, don't fix on a name | that doesn't have a number attached to it -- for example, realistically, | this version will ultimately not really be "standard"; we'll most likely | want to settle on a new version in a few more years. | | -Paul
- Re: standard Haskell Frank Christoph
- Standard Haskell Koen Claessen
- RE: Standard Haskell Frank A. Christoph
- RE: Standard Haskell Alex Ferguson
- Standard Haskell Simon L Peyton Jones
- Standard Haskell Simon L Peyton Jones
- Standard Haskell Simon Peyton-Jones
- Re: Standard Haskell Stephen H. Price
- Re: Standard Haskell Hans Aberg
- Re: Standard Haskell Paul Hudak
- Re: Standard Haskell Joe Fasel
- Re: Standard Haskell Greg Michaelson
- Re: Standard Haskell Dave Parrott 0171 542 9830
- Re: Standard Haskell Arthur Gold
- Re: Standard Haskell Andrew Rock
- Re: Standard Haskell Wolfram Kahl
- Re: Standard Haskell Hassett
- Re: Standard Haskell John Launchbury
- Re: Standard Haskell Rob Ballantyne
- Re: Standard Haskell Alex Ferguson