On Mon, 7 Sep 1998, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
>
> * Incidentally, I'm leaning towards 'Haskell 98' as the name.
Was it Bill Gates that suggested this to you? :-)
At 12:00 +0100 98/09/08, Stephen H. Price wrote:
> a) Haskell 1998 would be more appropriate in the light of Year 2000
> problems.
Probably in order to avoid Haskell 2000 being confused with Haskell 1900. :-)
Otherwise, since it is rather late this year, it should be called Haskell
1999. Those that use it will feel the next year that they have an
up-to-date version.
Hans Aberg
* Email: Hans Aberg <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Home Page: <http://www.matematik.su.se/~haberg/>
* AMS member listing: <http://www.ams.org/cml/>
- Re: standard Haskell John Hughes
- Re: standard Haskell John Hughes
- Re: standard Haskell Frank Christoph
- Standard Haskell Koen Claessen
- RE: Standard Haskell Frank A. Christoph
- RE: Standard Haskell Alex Ferguson
- Standard Haskell Simon L Peyton Jones
- Standard Haskell Simon L Peyton Jones
- Standard Haskell Simon Peyton-Jones
- Re: Standard Haskell Stephen H. Price
- Re: Standard Haskell Hans Aberg
- Re: Standard Haskell Paul Hudak
- Re: Standard Haskell Joe Fasel
- Re: Standard Haskell Greg Michaelson
- Re: Standard Haskell Dave Parrott 0171 542 9830
- Re: Standard Haskell Arthur Gold
- Re: Standard Haskell Andrew Rock
- Re: Standard Haskell Wolfram Kahl
- Re: Standard Haskell Hassett
- Re: Standard Haskell John Launchbury
- Re: Standard Haskell Rob Ballantyne
