Re: Standard Haskell

[Greg Michaelson]

> People seem to be forgetting the long-standing tradition of Algol (60),
> Fortran (66, 77, 90)

...not to mention Algol W, S-algol, PS-algol and H Level FORTRAN...
If Simon worked for IBM he could call it FP/I, in the tradition of PL/I. So
why not Haskell-1, to be followed by Haskell-2, or even Haskell-A...

I'm almost missing incomprehensible discourse on the Haskell type system...

Greg Michaelson