On 2012-06-11, at 13:08, Aaron J. Grier wrote: > On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 03:49:15PM -0500, Peter da Silva wrote: >> On 2012-05-19, at 11:43, Michael G Schwern wrote: >>> Or still using it, basically unchanged, as our primary system >>> programming language in 2012.
>> Yeh, it really sucks that in 50 years nobody has ever been able to >> develop a genuinely better alternative. > is it because there are not genuinely better alternatives, or the cost > of moving to them is too high? I don't know. I'm still waiting for someone to show me one.
