I did this bit of the patch:
@@ -308,10 +309,6 @@
<descriptors>
<descriptor>src/assembly/bin.xml</descriptor>
</descriptors>
- <descriptorRefs>
- <descriptorRef>src</descriptorRef>
- <descriptorRef>project</descriptorRef>
- </descriptorRefs>
</configuration>
</plugin>
</plugins>
... but as Lars says, there is a version up in the pluginManagement
section. Should I downgrade from beta5 to beta1?
Thanks lads,
St>Ack
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Lars Francke
<lars.fran...@gmail.com> wrote:
Because the current pom doesn't specify a plugin version, it's
using the latest version.
The pluginManagement section actually does specify a plugin version:
2.2-beta-5. But if that does cause problems - and the ticket you
linked to proves that feel free to downgrade but I would appreciate
it
if you did it in the pluginManagement section. I don't have access to
the source code right now so I can't provide an updated patch.
I'm swamped right now but I plan to continue working on the Maven
build as well once everything has settled down. Thanks for keeping up
the good work on this Paul!
Cheers,
Lars
Return-Path: hbase-dev-return-18272-
psmith=aconex....@hadoop.apache.org
Received: from gatekeeper.aconex.com (LHLO gatekeeper.aconex.com)
(192.168.102.10) by mail-au.aconex.com with LMTP; Sun, 14 Mar 2010
14:35:27
+1100 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by gatekeeper.aconex.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ECCE4884AB
for <psm...@aconex.com>; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:35:27 +1100 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at aconex.com
Received: from gatekeeper.aconex.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (gatekeeper.aconex.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
port 10024)
with ESMTP id km2MgDbjPJTS for <psm...@aconex.com>;
Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:35:23 +1100 (EST)
Received: from postoffice2.aconex.com (cuda.yarra.acx [192.168.102.2])
by gatekeeper.aconex.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BC0B4884A0
for <psm...@aconex.com>; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:35:23 +1100 (EST)
X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1268537722-21ea001d0000-Y2sTMG
X-Barracuda-URL: http://postoffice2.aconex.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi
Received: from postoffice.aconex.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by postoffice2.aconex.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id
A54D865A545
for <psm...@aconex.com>; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:35:22 +1100 (EST)
Received: from postoffice.aconex.com (postoffice.yarra.acx
[192.168.102.1]) by postoffice2.aconex.com with ESMTP id
rYMmYXVfAMBHWHz8 for <psm...@aconex.com>; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:35:22
+1100 (EST)
X-Barracuda-Envelope-From:
hbase-dev-return-18272-psmith=aconex....@hadoop.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
by postoffice.aconex.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B0B5BA50280
for <psm...@aconex.com>; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:32:37 +1100 (EST)
Received: (qmail 28038 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2010 03:35:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact hbase-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:hbase-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:hbase-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org>
List-Id: <hbase-dev.hadoop.apache.org>
Reply-To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Received: (qmail 28030 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2010 03:35:20 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136
)
by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 Mar 2010
03:35:20 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint....@gmail.com
designates 209.85.217.225 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.217.225] (HELO mail-gx0-f225.google.com) (209.85.217.225
)
by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 Mar 2010
03:35:19 +0000
Received: by gxk25 with SMTP id 25so1054366gxk.11
for <hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org>; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:34:58
-0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to
:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-
id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
bh=2XJuE3DRSu1PZi6mitn5hB/CWqgf8oZZg8Cq7kmSssE=;
b=RZFvxOjcosPp1kKzR3S2IRyF3s6U3RShvv32DKopAtC3RpA7y1jvGLXadoM96FJI0Z
YOxb2Yowwa4zIHn4mz3A8aj8TxvnefJ6Obu6uTWhOan1qgSI2KSIZQjKbQN9QyDsVSo0
Z5lgnd67OEHNbQIGwY2x2amNg9t13BtblmtlY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
b=ohJ64CZsLYoxZXEC223B1Yjf039FwFNukpuGNPm7MSIp+GGT
+SteBG2+DdAaTCQ7L7
VKVtv6tsSxIZCQjjhPmklrA1agRZY6ebfHgD5os7Ob2lZ/
AsSJyQwOlCZYgoRLm0L4nB
ym72VyxsSZZedzkdFKkccGaQcf6544depe/Ug=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: saint....@gmail.com
Received: by 10.101.42.12 with SMTP id u12mr332581anj.
56.1268537698290; Sat,
13 Mar 2010 19:34:58 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <fda1bfdd1003121936x6362dea5k3f37c2d4f17a9...@mail.gmail.com
>
References: <79b274bd-cb9a-4b81-b224-c0a7f8586...@aconex.com>
<fda1bfdd1003121936x6362dea5k3f37c2d4f17a9...@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:34:58 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2cf34d151e284d55
Message-ID: <7c962aed1003131934h7b03a75cs85ffbb164ff48...@mail.gmail.com
>
X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: Maven assembly speed issue (from discussion
with jdcryans on IRC)
Subject: Re: Maven assembly speed issue (from discussion with
jdcryans on IRC)
From: Stack <st...@duboce.net>
To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Barracuda-Connect: postoffice.yarra.acx[192.168.102.1]
X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1268537722
X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210
X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Aconex Staff Email Spam Firewall at aconex.com
X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -2.02
X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-2.02 using global scores of
TAG_LEVEL=3.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=5.0 KILL_LEVEL=6.0 tests=
X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.24799
Rule breakdown below
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
I did this bit of the patch:
@@ -308,10 +309,6 @@
<descriptors>
<descriptor>src/assembly/bin.xml</descriptor>
</descriptors>
- <descriptorRefs>
- <descriptorRef>src</descriptorRef>
- <descriptorRef>project</descriptorRef>
- </descriptorRefs>
</configuration>
</plugin>
</plugins>
... but as Lars says, there is a version up in the pluginManagement
section. Should I downgrade from beta5 to beta1?
Thanks lads,
St>Ack
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Lars Francke
<lars.fran...@gmail.com> wrote:
Because the current pom doesn't specify a plugin version, it's
using the latest version.
The pluginManagement section actually does specify a plugin version:
2.2-beta-5. But if that does cause problems - and the ticket you
linked to proves that feel free to downgrade but I would appreciate
it
if you did it in the pluginManagement section. I don't have access to
the source code right now so I can't provide an updated patch.
I'm swamped right now but I plan to continue working on the Maven
build as well once everything has settled down. Thanks for keeping up
the good work on this Paul!
Cheers,
Lars
