I've tried to build the trunk a few minutes ago (after pulling those changes in assembly plugin) and I've noticed a few problems:
1) here is how the target dir looks after mvn package assembly:directory, this feels wrong: http://gist.github.com/332129 2) ./bin/hbase is completely broken because of the change in the target directory name (.dir suffix) On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > I committed the change. Its much faster. Thanks lads. > St.Ack > > On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 10:34 PM, <psm...@aconex.com> wrote: >> Yep i would downgrade to beta-1 in the pluginmanagement section it's way >> faster. >> >> >> >> On 14/03/2010, at 14:35, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: >> >>> I did this bit of the patch: >>> >>> >>> @@ -308,10 +309,6 @@ >>> <descriptors> >>> <descriptor>src/assembly/bin.xml</descriptor> >>> </descriptors> >>> - <descriptorRefs> >>> - <descriptorRef>src</descriptorRef> >>> - <descriptorRef>project</descriptorRef> >>> - </descriptorRefs> >>> </configuration> >>> </plugin> >>> </plugins> >>> >>> >>> ... but as Lars says, there is a version up in the pluginManagement >>> section. Should I downgrade from beta5 to beta1? >>> >>> Thanks lads, >>> St>Ack >>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Lars Francke <lars.fran...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Because the current pom doesn't specify a plugin version, it's using the >>>>> latest version. >>>> >>>> The pluginManagement section actually does specify a plugin version: >>>> 2.2-beta-5. But if that does cause problems - and the ticket you >>>> linked to proves that feel free to downgrade but I would appreciate it >>>> if you did it in the pluginManagement section. I don't have access to >>>> the source code right now so I can't provide an updated patch. >>>> >>>> I'm swamped right now but I plan to continue working on the Maven >>>> build as well once everything has settled down. Thanks for keeping up >>>> the good work on this Paul! >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Lars >>>> >>> Return-Path: hbase-dev-return-18272-psmith=aconex....@hadoop.apache.org >>> Received: from gatekeeper.aconex.com (LHLO gatekeeper.aconex.com) >>> (192.168.102.10) by mail-au.aconex.com with LMTP; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 >>> 14:35:27 >>> +1100 (EST) >>> Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) >>> by gatekeeper.aconex.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ECCE4884AB >>> for <psm...@aconex.com>; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:35:27 +1100 (EST) >>> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at aconex.com >>> Received: from gatekeeper.aconex.com ([127.0.0.1]) >>> by localhost (gatekeeper.aconex.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port >>> 10024) >>> with ESMTP id km2MgDbjPJTS for <psm...@aconex.com>; >>> Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:35:23 +1100 (EST) >>> Received: from postoffice2.aconex.com (cuda.yarra.acx [192.168.102.2]) >>> by gatekeeper.aconex.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BC0B4884A0 >>> for <psm...@aconex.com>; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:35:23 +1100 (EST) >>> X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1268537722-21ea001d0000-Y2sTMG >>> X-Barracuda-URL: http://postoffice2.aconex.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi >>> Received: from postoffice.aconex.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) >>> by postoffice2.aconex.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id >>> A54D865A545 >>> for <psm...@aconex.com>; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:35:22 +1100 (EST) >>> Received: from postoffice.aconex.com (postoffice.yarra.acx >>> [192.168.102.1]) by postoffice2.aconex.com with ESMTP id rYMmYXVfAMBHWHz8 >>> for <psm...@aconex.com>; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:35:22 +1100 (EST) >>> X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: >>> hbase-dev-return-18272-psmith=aconex....@hadoop.apache.org >>> Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) >>> by postoffice.aconex.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B0B5BA50280 >>> for <psm...@aconex.com>; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:32:37 +1100 (EST) >>> Received: (qmail 28038 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2010 03:35:20 -0000 >>> Mailing-List: contact hbase-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm >>> Precedence: bulk >>> List-Help: <mailto:hbase-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org> >>> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:hbase-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org> >>> List-Post: <mailto:hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org> >>> List-Id: <hbase-dev.hadoop.apache.org> >>> Reply-To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org >>> Delivered-To: mailing list hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org >>> Received: (qmail 28030 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2010 03:35:20 -0000 >>> Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) >>> by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:35:20 +0000 >>> X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 >>> tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL >>> X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org >>> Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint....@gmail.com >>> designates 209.85.217.225 as permitted sender) >>> Received: from [209.85.217.225] (HELO mail-gx0-f225.google.com) >>> (209.85.217.225) >>> by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:35:19 +0000 >>> Received: by gxk25 with SMTP id 25so1054366gxk.11 >>> for <hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org>; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:34:58 -0800 >>> (PST) >>> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; >>> d=gmail.com; s=gamma; >>> h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to >>> :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to >>> :content-type; >>> bh=2XJuE3DRSu1PZi6mitn5hB/CWqgf8oZZg8Cq7kmSssE=; >>> b=RZFvxOjcosPp1kKzR3S2IRyF3s6U3RShvv32DKopAtC3RpA7y1jvGLXadoM96FJI0Z >>> >>> YOxb2Yowwa4zIHn4mz3A8aj8TxvnefJ6Obu6uTWhOan1qgSI2KSIZQjKbQN9QyDsVSo0 >>> Z5lgnd67OEHNbQIGwY2x2amNg9t13BtblmtlY= >>> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; >>> d=gmail.com; s=gamma; >>> h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date >>> :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; >>> b=ohJ64CZsLYoxZXEC223B1Yjf039FwFNukpuGNPm7MSIp+GGT+SteBG2+DdAaTCQ7L7 >>> >>> VKVtv6tsSxIZCQjjhPmklrA1agRZY6ebfHgD5os7Ob2lZ/AsSJyQwOlCZYgoRLm0L4nB >>> ym72VyxsSZZedzkdFKkccGaQcf6544depe/Ug= >>> MIME-Version: 1.0 >>> Sender: saint....@gmail.com >>> Received: by 10.101.42.12 with SMTP id u12mr332581anj.56.1268537698290; >>> Sat, >>> 13 Mar 2010 19:34:58 -0800 (PST) >>> In-Reply-To: <fda1bfdd1003121936x6362dea5k3f37c2d4f17a9...@mail.gmail.com> >>> References: <79b274bd-cb9a-4b81-b224-c0a7f8586...@aconex.com> >>> <fda1bfdd1003121936x6362dea5k3f37c2d4f17a9...@mail.gmail.com> >>> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:34:58 -0800 >>> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2cf34d151e284d55 >>> Message-ID: <7c962aed1003131934h7b03a75cs85ffbb164ff48...@mail.gmail.com> >>> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: Maven assembly speed issue (from discussion with >>> jdcryans on IRC) >>> Subject: Re: Maven assembly speed issue (from discussion with jdcryans on >>> IRC) >>> From: Stack <st...@duboce.net> >>> To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >>> X-Barracuda-Connect: postoffice.yarra.acx[192.168.102.1] >>> X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1268537722 >>> X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210 >>> X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Aconex Staff Email Spam Firewall at >>> aconex.com >>> X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -2.02 >>> X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-2.02 using global scores of >>> TAG_LEVEL=3.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=5.0 KILL_LEVEL=6.0 tests= >>> X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.24799 >>> Rule breakdown below >>> pts rule name description >>> ---- ---------------------- >>> -------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> I did this bit of the patch: >>> >>> >>> @@ -308,10 +309,6 @@ >>> <descriptors> >>> <descriptor>src/assembly/bin.xml</descriptor> >>> </descriptors> >>> - <descriptorRefs> >>> - <descriptorRef>src</descriptorRef> >>> - <descriptorRef>project</descriptorRef> >>> - </descriptorRefs> >>> </configuration> >>> </plugin> >>> </plugins> >>> >>> >>> ... but as Lars says, there is a version up in the pluginManagement >>> section. Should I downgrade from beta5 to beta1? >>> >>> Thanks lads, >>> St>Ack >>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Lars Francke <lars.fran...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Because the current pom doesn't specify a plugin version, it's using the >>>>> latest version. >>>> >>>> The pluginManagement section actually does specify a plugin version: >>>> 2.2-beta-5. But if that does cause problems - and the ticket you >>>> linked to proves that feel free to downgrade but I would appreciate it >>>> if you did it in the pluginManagement section. I don't have access to >>>> the source code right now so I can't provide an updated patch. >>>> >>>> I'm swamped right now but I plan to continue working on the Maven >>>> build as well once everything has settled down. Thanks for keeping up >>>> the good work on this Paul! >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Lars >>>> >> > -- Alexey Kovyrin http://kovyrin.net/
