I tried beta2. It only assembled the bin.tar.gz. The beta3 did same. For now I just put back beta5 since it works (if slow).
Thanks Paul, St.Ack On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Paul Smith <psm...@aconex.com> wrote: > ahhh, sorry guys! > > umm, I think we'll have to find a sweet spot between beta-1 and beta-5. > > From the assembly plugin docs: > > http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-assembly-plugin/assembly.html (binaries > section) > > outputFileNameMapping Sets the mapping pattern for all NON-UNPACKED > dependencies included in this assembly. Default is > ${module.artifactId}-${module.version}${dashClassifier?}.${module.extension}. > (Since 2.2-beta-2; 2.2-beta-1 uses > ${artifactId}-${version}${dashClassifier?}.${extension}) NOTE: If the > dependencySet specifies unpack == true, outputFileNameMapping WILL NOT BE > USED; in these cases, use outputDirectory. The default value is > ${module.artifactId}-${module.version}${dashClassifier?}.${module.extension}. > > > so maybe try beta-2.. ? > > my apologise. > > Paul > > On 15/03/2010, at 5:41 AM, Alexey Kovyrin wrote: > >> I've tried to build the trunk a few minutes ago (after pulling those >> changes in assembly plugin) and I've noticed a few problems: >> >> 1) here is how the target dir looks after mvn package >> assembly:directory, this feels wrong: http://gist.github.com/332129 >> 2) ./bin/hbase is completely broken because of the change in the >> target directory name (.dir suffix) >> >> On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: >>> I committed the change. Its much faster. Thanks lads. >>> St.Ack >>> >>> On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 10:34 PM, <psm...@aconex.com> wrote: >>>> Yep i would downgrade to beta-1 in the pluginmanagement section it's way >>>> faster. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 14/03/2010, at 14:35, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I did this bit of the patch: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> @@ -308,10 +309,6 @@ >>>>> <descriptors> >>>>> <descriptor>src/assembly/bin.xml</descriptor> >>>>> </descriptors> >>>>> - <descriptorRefs> >>>>> - <descriptorRef>src</descriptorRef> >>>>> - <descriptorRef>project</descriptorRef> >>>>> - </descriptorRefs> >>>>> </configuration> >>>>> </plugin> >>>>> </plugins> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ... but as Lars says, there is a version up in the pluginManagement >>>>> section. Should I downgrade from beta5 to beta1? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks lads, >>>>> St>Ack >>>>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Lars Francke <lars.fran...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Because the current pom doesn't specify a plugin version, it's using the >>>>>>> latest version. >>>>>> >>>>>> The pluginManagement section actually does specify a plugin version: >>>>>> 2.2-beta-5. But if that does cause problems - and the ticket you >>>>>> linked to proves that feel free to downgrade but I would appreciate it >>>>>> if you did it in the pluginManagement section. I don't have access to >>>>>> the source code right now so I can't provide an updated patch. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm swamped right now but I plan to continue working on the Maven >>>>>> build as well once everything has settled down. Thanks for keeping up >>>>>> the good work on this Paul! >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Lars >>>>>> >>>>> Return-Path: hbase-dev-return-18272-psmith=aconex....@hadoop.apache.org >>>>> Received: from gatekeeper.aconex.com (LHLO gatekeeper.aconex.com) >>>>> (192.168.102.10) by mail-au.aconex.com with LMTP; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 >>>>> 14:35:27 >>>>> +1100 (EST) >>>>> Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) >>>>> by gatekeeper.aconex.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ECCE4884AB >>>>> for <psm...@aconex.com>; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:35:27 +1100 (EST) >>>>> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at aconex.com >>>>> Received: from gatekeeper.aconex.com ([127.0.0.1]) >>>>> by localhost (gatekeeper.aconex.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port >>>>> 10024) >>>>> with ESMTP id km2MgDbjPJTS for <psm...@aconex.com>; >>>>> Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:35:23 +1100 (EST) >>>>> Received: from postoffice2.aconex.com (cuda.yarra.acx [192.168.102.2]) >>>>> by gatekeeper.aconex.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BC0B4884A0 >>>>> for <psm...@aconex.com>; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:35:23 +1100 (EST) >>>>> X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1268537722-21ea001d0000-Y2sTMG >>>>> X-Barracuda-URL: http://postoffice2.aconex.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi >>>>> Received: from postoffice.aconex.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) >>>>> by postoffice2.aconex.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id >>>>> A54D865A545 >>>>> for <psm...@aconex.com>; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:35:22 +1100 (EST) >>>>> Received: from postoffice.aconex.com (postoffice.yarra.acx >>>>> [192.168.102.1]) by postoffice2.aconex.com with ESMTP id rYMmYXVfAMBHWHz8 >>>>> for <psm...@aconex.com>; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:35:22 +1100 (EST) >>>>> X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: >>>>> hbase-dev-return-18272-psmith=aconex....@hadoop.apache.org >>>>> Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) >>>>> by postoffice.aconex.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B0B5BA50280 >>>>> for <psm...@aconex.com>; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:32:37 +1100 (EST) >>>>> Received: (qmail 28038 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2010 03:35:20 -0000 >>>>> Mailing-List: contact hbase-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm >>>>> Precedence: bulk >>>>> List-Help: <mailto:hbase-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org> >>>>> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:hbase-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org> >>>>> List-Post: <mailto:hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org> >>>>> List-Id: <hbase-dev.hadoop.apache.org> >>>>> Reply-To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org >>>>> Delivered-To: mailing list hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org >>>>> Received: (qmail 28030 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2010 03:35:20 -0000 >>>>> Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) >>>>> by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:35:20 +0000 >>>>> X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 >>>>> tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL >>>>> X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org >>>>> Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint....@gmail.com >>>>> designates 209.85.217.225 as permitted sender) >>>>> Received: from [209.85.217.225] (HELO mail-gx0-f225.google.com) >>>>> (209.85.217.225) >>>>> by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:35:19 +0000 >>>>> Received: by gxk25 with SMTP id 25so1054366gxk.11 >>>>> for <hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org>; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:34:58 -0800 >>>>> (PST) >>>>> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; >>>>> d=gmail.com; s=gamma; >>>>> h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to >>>>> :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to >>>>> :content-type; >>>>> bh=2XJuE3DRSu1PZi6mitn5hB/CWqgf8oZZg8Cq7kmSssE=; >>>>> b=RZFvxOjcosPp1kKzR3S2IRyF3s6U3RShvv32DKopAtC3RpA7y1jvGLXadoM96FJI0Z >>>>> >>>>> YOxb2Yowwa4zIHn4mz3A8aj8TxvnefJ6Obu6uTWhOan1qgSI2KSIZQjKbQN9QyDsVSo0 >>>>> Z5lgnd67OEHNbQIGwY2x2amNg9t13BtblmtlY= >>>>> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; >>>>> d=gmail.com; s=gamma; >>>>> h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date >>>>> :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; >>>>> b=ohJ64CZsLYoxZXEC223B1Yjf039FwFNukpuGNPm7MSIp+GGT+SteBG2+DdAaTCQ7L7 >>>>> >>>>> VKVtv6tsSxIZCQjjhPmklrA1agRZY6ebfHgD5os7Ob2lZ/AsSJyQwOlCZYgoRLm0L4nB >>>>> ym72VyxsSZZedzkdFKkccGaQcf6544depe/Ug= >>>>> MIME-Version: 1.0 >>>>> Sender: saint....@gmail.com >>>>> Received: by 10.101.42.12 with SMTP id u12mr332581anj.56.1268537698290; >>>>> Sat, >>>>> 13 Mar 2010 19:34:58 -0800 (PST) >>>>> In-Reply-To: <fda1bfdd1003121936x6362dea5k3f37c2d4f17a9...@mail.gmail.com> >>>>> References: <79b274bd-cb9a-4b81-b224-c0a7f8586...@aconex.com> >>>>> <fda1bfdd1003121936x6362dea5k3f37c2d4f17a9...@mail.gmail.com> >>>>> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:34:58 -0800 >>>>> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2cf34d151e284d55 >>>>> Message-ID: <7c962aed1003131934h7b03a75cs85ffbb164ff48...@mail.gmail.com> >>>>> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: Maven assembly speed issue (from discussion with >>>>> jdcryans on IRC) >>>>> Subject: Re: Maven assembly speed issue (from discussion with jdcryans on >>>>> IRC) >>>>> From: Stack <st...@duboce.net> >>>>> To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org >>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >>>>> X-Barracuda-Connect: postoffice.yarra.acx[192.168.102.1] >>>>> X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1268537722 >>>>> X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210 >>>>> X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Aconex Staff Email Spam Firewall at >>>>> aconex.com >>>>> X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -2.02 >>>>> X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-2.02 using global scores of >>>>> TAG_LEVEL=3.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=5.0 KILL_LEVEL=6.0 tests= >>>>> X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.24799 >>>>> Rule breakdown below >>>>> pts rule name description >>>>> ---- ---------------------- >>>>> -------------------------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>> I did this bit of the patch: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> @@ -308,10 +309,6 @@ >>>>> <descriptors> >>>>> <descriptor>src/assembly/bin.xml</descriptor> >>>>> </descriptors> >>>>> - <descriptorRefs> >>>>> - <descriptorRef>src</descriptorRef> >>>>> - <descriptorRef>project</descriptorRef> >>>>> - </descriptorRefs> >>>>> </configuration> >>>>> </plugin> >>>>> </plugins> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ... but as Lars says, there is a version up in the pluginManagement >>>>> section. Should I downgrade from beta5 to beta1? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks lads, >>>>> St>Ack >>>>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Lars Francke <lars.fran...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Because the current pom doesn't specify a plugin version, it's using the >>>>>>> latest version. >>>>>> >>>>>> The pluginManagement section actually does specify a plugin version: >>>>>> 2.2-beta-5. But if that does cause problems - and the ticket you >>>>>> linked to proves that feel free to downgrade but I would appreciate it >>>>>> if you did it in the pluginManagement section. I don't have access to >>>>>> the source code right now so I can't provide an updated patch. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm swamped right now but I plan to continue working on the Maven >>>>>> build as well once everything has settled down. Thanks for keeping up >>>>>> the good work on this Paul! >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Lars >>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Alexey Kovyrin >> http://kovyrin.net/ > >
