I committed the change. Its much faster. Thanks lads. St.Ack
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 10:34 PM, <psm...@aconex.com> wrote: > Yep i would downgrade to beta-1 in the pluginmanagement section it's way > faster. > > > > On 14/03/2010, at 14:35, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > >> I did this bit of the patch: >> >> >> @@ -308,10 +309,6 @@ >> <descriptors> >> <descriptor>src/assembly/bin.xml</descriptor> >> </descriptors> >> - <descriptorRefs> >> - <descriptorRef>src</descriptorRef> >> - <descriptorRef>project</descriptorRef> >> - </descriptorRefs> >> </configuration> >> </plugin> >> </plugins> >> >> >> ... but as Lars says, there is a version up in the pluginManagement >> section. Should I downgrade from beta5 to beta1? >> >> Thanks lads, >> St>Ack >> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Lars Francke <lars.fran...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>>> >>>> Because the current pom doesn't specify a plugin version, it's using the >>>> latest version. >>> >>> The pluginManagement section actually does specify a plugin version: >>> 2.2-beta-5. But if that does cause problems - and the ticket you >>> linked to proves that feel free to downgrade but I would appreciate it >>> if you did it in the pluginManagement section. I don't have access to >>> the source code right now so I can't provide an updated patch. >>> >>> I'm swamped right now but I plan to continue working on the Maven >>> build as well once everything has settled down. Thanks for keeping up >>> the good work on this Paul! >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Lars >>> >> Return-Path: hbase-dev-return-18272-psmith=aconex....@hadoop.apache.org >> Received: from gatekeeper.aconex.com (LHLO gatekeeper.aconex.com) >> (192.168.102.10) by mail-au.aconex.com with LMTP; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 >> 14:35:27 >> +1100 (EST) >> Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) >> by gatekeeper.aconex.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ECCE4884AB >> for <psm...@aconex.com>; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:35:27 +1100 (EST) >> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at aconex.com >> Received: from gatekeeper.aconex.com ([127.0.0.1]) >> by localhost (gatekeeper.aconex.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port >> 10024) >> with ESMTP id km2MgDbjPJTS for <psm...@aconex.com>; >> Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:35:23 +1100 (EST) >> Received: from postoffice2.aconex.com (cuda.yarra.acx [192.168.102.2]) >> by gatekeeper.aconex.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BC0B4884A0 >> for <psm...@aconex.com>; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:35:23 +1100 (EST) >> X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1268537722-21ea001d0000-Y2sTMG >> X-Barracuda-URL: http://postoffice2.aconex.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi >> Received: from postoffice.aconex.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) >> by postoffice2.aconex.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id >> A54D865A545 >> for <psm...@aconex.com>; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:35:22 +1100 (EST) >> Received: from postoffice.aconex.com (postoffice.yarra.acx >> [192.168.102.1]) by postoffice2.aconex.com with ESMTP id rYMmYXVfAMBHWHz8 >> for <psm...@aconex.com>; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:35:22 +1100 (EST) >> X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: >> hbase-dev-return-18272-psmith=aconex....@hadoop.apache.org >> Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) >> by postoffice.aconex.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B0B5BA50280 >> for <psm...@aconex.com>; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:32:37 +1100 (EST) >> Received: (qmail 28038 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2010 03:35:20 -0000 >> Mailing-List: contact hbase-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm >> Precedence: bulk >> List-Help: <mailto:hbase-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org> >> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:hbase-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org> >> List-Post: <mailto:hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org> >> List-Id: <hbase-dev.hadoop.apache.org> >> Reply-To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org >> Delivered-To: mailing list hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org >> Received: (qmail 28030 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2010 03:35:20 -0000 >> Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) >> by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:35:20 +0000 >> X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 >> tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL >> X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org >> Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint....@gmail.com >> designates 209.85.217.225 as permitted sender) >> Received: from [209.85.217.225] (HELO mail-gx0-f225.google.com) >> (209.85.217.225) >> by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:35:19 +0000 >> Received: by gxk25 with SMTP id 25so1054366gxk.11 >> for <hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org>; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:34:58 -0800 >> (PST) >> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; >> d=gmail.com; s=gamma; >> h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to >> :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to >> :content-type; >> bh=2XJuE3DRSu1PZi6mitn5hB/CWqgf8oZZg8Cq7kmSssE=; >> b=RZFvxOjcosPp1kKzR3S2IRyF3s6U3RShvv32DKopAtC3RpA7y1jvGLXadoM96FJI0Z >> >> YOxb2Yowwa4zIHn4mz3A8aj8TxvnefJ6Obu6uTWhOan1qgSI2KSIZQjKbQN9QyDsVSo0 >> Z5lgnd67OEHNbQIGwY2x2amNg9t13BtblmtlY= >> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; >> d=gmail.com; s=gamma; >> h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date >> :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; >> b=ohJ64CZsLYoxZXEC223B1Yjf039FwFNukpuGNPm7MSIp+GGT+SteBG2+DdAaTCQ7L7 >> >> VKVtv6tsSxIZCQjjhPmklrA1agRZY6ebfHgD5os7Ob2lZ/AsSJyQwOlCZYgoRLm0L4nB >> ym72VyxsSZZedzkdFKkccGaQcf6544depe/Ug= >> MIME-Version: 1.0 >> Sender: saint....@gmail.com >> Received: by 10.101.42.12 with SMTP id u12mr332581anj.56.1268537698290; >> Sat, >> 13 Mar 2010 19:34:58 -0800 (PST) >> In-Reply-To: <fda1bfdd1003121936x6362dea5k3f37c2d4f17a9...@mail.gmail.com> >> References: <79b274bd-cb9a-4b81-b224-c0a7f8586...@aconex.com> >> <fda1bfdd1003121936x6362dea5k3f37c2d4f17a9...@mail.gmail.com> >> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:34:58 -0800 >> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2cf34d151e284d55 >> Message-ID: <7c962aed1003131934h7b03a75cs85ffbb164ff48...@mail.gmail.com> >> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: Maven assembly speed issue (from discussion with >> jdcryans on IRC) >> Subject: Re: Maven assembly speed issue (from discussion with jdcryans on >> IRC) >> From: Stack <st...@duboce.net> >> To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >> X-Barracuda-Connect: postoffice.yarra.acx[192.168.102.1] >> X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1268537722 >> X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210 >> X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Aconex Staff Email Spam Firewall at >> aconex.com >> X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -2.02 >> X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-2.02 using global scores of >> TAG_LEVEL=3.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=5.0 KILL_LEVEL=6.0 tests= >> X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.24799 >> Rule breakdown below >> pts rule name description >> ---- ---------------------- >> -------------------------------------------------- >> >> I did this bit of the patch: >> >> >> @@ -308,10 +309,6 @@ >> <descriptors> >> <descriptor>src/assembly/bin.xml</descriptor> >> </descriptors> >> - <descriptorRefs> >> - <descriptorRef>src</descriptorRef> >> - <descriptorRef>project</descriptorRef> >> - </descriptorRefs> >> </configuration> >> </plugin> >> </plugins> >> >> >> ... but as Lars says, there is a version up in the pluginManagement >> section. Should I downgrade from beta5 to beta1? >> >> Thanks lads, >> St>Ack >> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Lars Francke <lars.fran...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>>> >>>> Because the current pom doesn't specify a plugin version, it's using the >>>> latest version. >>> >>> The pluginManagement section actually does specify a plugin version: >>> 2.2-beta-5. But if that does cause problems - and the ticket you >>> linked to proves that feel free to downgrade but I would appreciate it >>> if you did it in the pluginManagement section. I don't have access to >>> the source code right now so I can't provide an updated patch. >>> >>> I'm swamped right now but I plan to continue working on the Maven >>> build as well once everything has settled down. Thanks for keeping up >>> the good work on this Paul! >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Lars >>> >
