Hi - yes this won't match - the node timeseries we released in PTN were derived using the CIFTI (surface etc) version of the data, not volumetric. Cheers.
> On 31 Jul 2015, at 15:50, Yizhou Ma <maxxx...@umn.edu> wrote: > > Dear HCP experts, > > I am trying to run my own dual regression on HCP's rsfMRI data. What I did is > use wb_command -cifti-convert -to-nifti to convert group ICA maps and > individual rsfMRI scans to NifTI and use FSL's dual_regression command. > > dual_regression melodic_IC.nii.gz 1 -1 0 ./test 100307_rsfMRI.nii.gz > > I was able to get dual regression results. Yet the dual regression 1 results > I get does not match up with the nodetimeseries ts2 results provided in HCP's > PTN release. I have opened my group ICA maps and rsfMRI scan in matlab to > ensure that the values in them match up with the cifti files. I have tried > dual regression with another subject but still the results did not match. > > Do anyone have an idea what might have gone wrong? > > Thank you very much, > Cherry > _______________________________________________ > HCP-Users mailing list > HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org > http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Stephen M. Smith, Professor of Biomedical Engineering Head of Analysis, Oxford University FMRIB Centre FMRIB, JR Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK +44 (0) 1865 222726 (fax 222717) st...@fmrib.ox.ac.uk http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve <http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Stop the cultural destruction of Tibet <http://smithinks.net/> _______________________________________________ HCP-Users mailing list HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users
