[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14709680#comment-14709680
 ] 

Zhe Zhang commented on HDFS-8909:
---------------------------------

Jenkins has been unstable over the past several days. But we finally got a 
meaningful [run | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-HDFS-8909/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/].

{{testRecoverFinalizedBlock}} is the only one that fails here but not in 
HDFS-7285-merge branch. I haven't tried debugging it. 

bq. After removes setBlockId, I think addReplicaIfNotPresent is the same for 
both.
I agree. Maybe we should remove {{setBlockId}} and instead assert the reported 
block ID is always the same as the ID of the replica. Otherwise the correctness 
depends on issues like HDFS-8838.

> Erasure coding: update BlockInfoContiguousUC and BlockInfoStripedUC to use 
> BlockUnderConstructionFeature
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-8909
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8909
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: namenode
>    Affects Versions: HDFS-7285
>            Reporter: Zhe Zhang
>            Assignee: Jing Zhao
>         Attachments: HDFS-8909.000.patch, HDFS-8909.001.patch, 
> HDFS-8909.002.patch
>
>
> HDFS-8801 converts {{BlockInfoUC}} as a feature. We should consolidate 
> {{BlockInfoContiguousUC}} and {{BlockInfoStripedUC}} logics to use this 
> feature.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to