[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16419655#comment-16419655
 ] 

Erik Krogen commented on HDFS-13331:
------------------------------------

Hey [~zero45], just looked through the most recent patch. I have a question 
about using a static {{alignmentContext}} in {{Client}}. We can potentially 
have two {{DFSClient}} objects in the same JVM which are communicating with 
completely difference namespaces, each of which should have their own 
{{alignmentContext}}. The current implementation would not support this, 
AFAICT. Am I correct? I don't think that is acceptable IIUC.

> Add lastSeenStateId to RpcRequestHeader.
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-13331
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13331
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>    Affects Versions: HDFS-12943
>            Reporter: Plamen Jeliazkov
>            Assignee: Plamen Jeliazkov
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: HDFS-13331-HDFS-12943.002.patch, 
> HDFS-13331-HDFS-12943.003..patch, HDFS-13331.trunk.001.patch, 
> HDFS_13331.trunk.000.patch
>
>
> HDFS-12977 added a stateId into the RpcResponseHeader which is returned by 
> NameNode and stored by DFSClient.
> This JIRA is to followup on that work and have the DFSClient send their 
> stored "lastSeenStateId" in the RpcRequestHeader so that ObserverNodes can 
> then compare with their own and act accordingly.
> This JIRA work focuses on just the part of making DFSClient send their state 
> through RpcRequestHeader.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to