[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-11246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16883621#comment-16883621
 ] 

He Xiaoqiao commented on HDFS-11246:
------------------------------------

[~daryn], Thanks very much for your positive comments. As said above, this 
patch is almost ready but it meets some failure unit test, I will try to dig 
and fix that recently.
{quote}I won't have cycles to look at it until next week due to prepping for 
kms/rpc deploy.{quote}
We will wait here util you come back and give some further more reviews. Thanks 
again.

> FSNameSystem#logAuditEvent should be called outside the read or write locks
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-11246
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-11246
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.7.3
>            Reporter: Kuhu Shukla
>            Assignee: Kuhu Shukla
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: HDFS-11246.001.patch, HDFS-11246.002.patch, 
> HDFS-11246.003.patch, HDFS-11246.004.patch, HDFS-11246.005.patch, 
> HDFS-11246.006.patch, HDFS-11246.007.patch, HDFS-11246.008.patch
>
>
> {code}
>     readLock();
>     boolean success = true;
>     ContentSummary cs;
>     try {
>       checkOperation(OperationCategory.READ);
>       cs = FSDirStatAndListingOp.getContentSummary(dir, src);
>     } catch (AccessControlException ace) {
>       success = false;
>       logAuditEvent(success, operationName, src);
>       throw ace;
>     } finally {
>       readUnlock(operationName);
>     }
> {code}
> It would be nice to have audit logging outside the lock esp. in scenarios 
> where applications hammer a given operation several times. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to