Hi,
I feel that we hardly need yet another list. There are currently
two low volume general discussion lists for the hurd: debian-hurd
and help-hurd.
Can we justify another list on a topic that has generated ten emails
to date? I do not think so. If in a month this thread still has
a reasonable level of interest, then I agree, we should set one up.
Until then, we should wait.
-Neal
On Mon, Apr 10, 2000 at 03:43:07PM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2000 at 09:26:40PM +0100, Nic Ferrier wrote:
>
> > >I think you're right. We need a [EMAIL PROTECTED] list :)
> >
> > Therefore I'd like to ask if anyone would be interested in an list
> > setup on a commercial list server?
> >
> > We'd have to suffer adverts but we won't have to hassle GNU or load
> > their machines with the discussion.
> >
> > If people want it I'll set one up.
>
> I beleive that it's best for GNU-related discussion to remain on the GNU
> servers. It's not a bother, and it ensures that as volunteers go away,
> get bought by Microsoft or whatnot, that the list can continue to exist
> in piece. =)
>
> Is hurd-vision a good name for multimedia discussion? (Any dissentors?
> anyone care?)
>
> --
> There is no sin except stupidity.
> - Oscar Wilde
>
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Neal Walfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UMass Lowell - Fox 1512 Phone: 978-934-5347
Fax: 603-415-3645
Love is the triumph of imagination over intelligence.
-- H. L. Mencken