On Tue, Apr 11, 2000 at 01:02:07AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, Jeff Bailey wrote:
>
> > Is hurd-vision a good name for multimedia discussion? (Any dissentors?
> > anyone care?)
>
> Is the focus of this new list multimedia only? I thought the direction was
> broader than that.
>
> hurd-vision would be ok, but it sort of implies pie-in-the-sky ideals
> (fluffy stuff). hurd-direction or hurd-specs might be better, especially
> if a summary doc/FAQ was maintained (with pointers to relevant/current
> code) on the actual list content (perhaps something on the order of kernel
> cousins, etc.).
I don't think there'd be much value in a hurd-direction list without the
input of Thomas, Roland, Mark & Crew. Otherwise we'd be like Greek
Philosophers discussing reality without the ability to test or implement
our theories.
--
There is no sin except stupidity.
- Oscar Wilde
