Re: A new list for Direction of Hurd discussion

[jwf]

On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, Jeff Bailey wrote:

> Is hurd-vision a good name for multimedia discussion?  (Any dissentors?  
> anyone care?)

Is the focus of this new list multimedia only? I thought the direction was
broader than that.

hurd-vision would be ok, but it sort of implies pie-in-the-sky ideals
(fluffy stuff).  hurd-direction or hurd-specs might be better, especially
if a summary doc/FAQ was maintained (with pointers to relevant/current
code) on the actual list content (perhaps something on the order of kernel
cousins, etc.).

-- jim