I concur. The word "vision" means different things to different people, but
"direction" may be more down-to-earth. I think it'll end up being a list
where possible applications for the Hurd are discussed. Possibly it will
include rationale, method, and problems.
At 01:02 AM 4/11/00 -0400, you wrote:
>On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, Jeff Bailey wrote:
>
> > Is hurd-vision a good name for multimedia discussion? (Any dissentors?
> > anyone care?)
>
>Is the focus of this new list multimedia only? I thought the direction was
>broader than that.
>
>hurd-vision would be ok, but it sort of implies pie-in-the-sky ideals
>(fluffy stuff). hurd-direction or hurd-specs might be better, especially
>if a summary doc/FAQ was maintained (with pointers to relevant/current
>code) on the actual list content (perhaps something on the order of kernel
>cousins, etc.).
