I contributed testing/yadis (created with Dan) although at the time,
I did not have commit access so David committed it for me. Which is
what you'll see in the logs.
Which is only a little bit of code, but exists in addition to the
list of code you mention. So far, nobody has complained the tests
don't work, thus no further updates since. (and the underlying Yadis
spec hasn't changed either since)
Is it necessarily true that the PIP is the only code that's "left"
other than those tests? Looks like there is more stuff in SVN ...
Cheers,
Johannes.
On Mar 13, 2007, at 22:28, Ted Leung wrote:
Ok,
Here's how I'd like to handle this. If you want to continue to be
a committer on Heraldry - which means that you actually worked on
the Ruby PIP (since that's the only code we have left), then please
reply and indicate that, and your affiliation. You must do this
yourself. I will not be accepting a block submission of names for
the new committer list. If you can't be bothered to send this e-
mail yourself, then you won't like the amount of work that it is
going to take to get Heraldry going.
Thanks,
Ted
On Mar 13, 2007, at 11:53 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
The Incubator PMC has been discussing Heraldry. We need to make
it clear
that there is only one set of rules that will be tolerated here,
and those
are ours. Anyone who is willing to abide by them is enthusiasticaly
welcomed to participate. But anyone who isn't willing to abide by
our basic
rules for open, collaborative, development cannot be permitted to
trade on
the ASF's good name.
The Mentors are asked to submit a new Committer list and suggested
PPMC
consisting of anyone who is prepared to operating under our rules,
and
expresses that interest. If such a list cannot be produced, we're
prepared
to close the project. But we do hope that there are sufficient
people
interested and willing to work on this project in an open and
collaborative
manner.
We would like this list by March 19, at which point we will either
replace
the commit ACL or remove it.
The revised group will be charged with reviewing the Heraldry
charter -- the
remaining scope of the project will need to be reevaluated in
light of the
changes -- and resubmitting that plan to the Incubator PMC for
review.
--- Noel
