So assuming there is enough other interest, I'd like to continue participating. I see this as participating on the existing Ruby PIP codebase as needed via VeriSign, but I personally really want to start a new ruby on rails OpenID Provider. I think a lot of lessons have been learned since the rPIP was first written as well as RoR as a technology has significantly advanced.
So my main interest would be finding a group of people wanting to work on kick-ass Ruby OpenID libraries which can be used in a new RoR OpenID Provider. I'd love to know if others, whether currently a committer or not, would have interest in working on this here as well? --David -----Original Message----- From: Ted Leung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 10:28 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Moving forward or moving out Ok, Here's how I'd like to handle this. If you want to continue to be a committer on Heraldry - which means that you actually worked on the Ruby PIP (since that's the only code we have left), then please reply and indicate that, and your affiliation. You must do this yourself. I will not be accepting a block submission of names for the new committer list. If you can't be bothered to send this e- mail yourself, then you won't like the amount of work that it is going to take to get Heraldry going. Thanks, Ted On Mar 13, 2007, at 11:53 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > The Incubator PMC has been discussing Heraldry. We need to make it > clear that there is only one set of rules that will be tolerated here, > and those are ours. Anyone who is willing to abide by them is > enthusiasticaly welcomed to participate. But anyone who isn't willing > to abide by our basic rules for open, collaborative, development > cannot be permitted to trade on the ASF's good name. > > The Mentors are asked to submit a new Committer list and suggested > PPMC consisting of anyone who is prepared to operating under our > rules, and expresses that interest. If such a list cannot be > produced, we're prepared to close the project. But we do hope that > there are sufficient people interested and willing to work on this > project in an open and collaborative manner. > > We would like this list by March 19, at which point we will either > replace the commit ACL or remove it. > > The revised group will be charged with reviewing the Heraldry charter > -- the remaining scope of the project will need to be reevaluated in > light of the changes -- and resubmitting that plan to the Incubator > PMC for review. > > --- Noel >
