Has this been discussed: how about using http://labs.apache.org ?
> -----Original Message----- > From: Recordon, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 10:58 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: Moving forward or moving out > > So assuming there is enough other interest, I'd like to > continue participating. I see this as participating on the > existing Ruby PIP codebase as needed via VeriSign, but I > personally really want to start a new ruby on rails OpenID > Provider. I think a lot of lessons have been learned since > the rPIP was first written as well as RoR as a technology has > significantly advanced. > > So my main interest would be finding a group of people > wanting to work on kick-ass Ruby OpenID libraries which can > be used in a new RoR OpenID Provider. I'd love to know if > others, whether currently a committer or not, would have > interest in working on this here as well? > > --David > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ted Leung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 10:28 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Moving forward or moving out > > Ok, > > Here's how I'd like to handle this. If you want to continue > to be a committer on Heraldry - which means that you actually > worked on the Ruby PIP (since that's the only code we have > left), then please reply > and indicate that, and your affiliation. You must do this > yourself. I will not be accepting a block submission of names for > the new committer list. If you can't be bothered to send this e- > mail yourself, then you won't like the amount of work that it > is going to take to get Heraldry going. > > Thanks, > > Ted > > On Mar 13, 2007, at 11:53 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > > The Incubator PMC has been discussing Heraldry. We need to make it > > clear that there is only one set of rules that will be > tolerated here, > > > and those are ours. Anyone who is willing to abide by them is > > enthusiasticaly welcomed to participate. But anyone who > isn't willing > > > to abide by our basic rules for open, collaborative, development > > cannot be permitted to trade on the ASF's good name. > > > > The Mentors are asked to submit a new Committer list and suggested > > PPMC consisting of anyone who is prepared to operating under our > > rules, and expresses that interest. If such a list cannot be > > produced, we're prepared to close the project. But we do hope that > > there are sufficient people interested and willing to work on this > > project in an open and collaborative manner. > > > > We would like this list by March 19, at which point we will either > > replace the commit ACL or remove it. > > > > The revised group will be charged with reviewing the > Heraldry charter > > -- the remaining scope of the project will need to be > reevaluated in > > light of the changes -- and resubmitting that plan to the Incubator > > PMC for review. > > > > --- Noel > > > >
