Absolutely.  Even if I wasn't building a period piece, this is what I would use.

My pieces are from an old steamship shaft bearing, they have been under extreme 
heat, pressure, and in moisture for a long time, and are nearly as hard and 
stable as iron.

I have to machine them on my metal lathe. The woodworking equipment won't work.

Chris

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 2/25/2007 at 12:33 AM Reymen Marc wrote:

>contempory: so bearings in lignum vitae?
>Marc
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Chris Nogy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[email protected]>
>Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2007 10:11 PM
>Subject: Re[4]: [HG] Now that I have some design parameters...the carved 
>body question
>
>
>>I have the same concerns, and nave never tried to push the limits of the 
>>wood.  I like to work in maple, cherry, and walnut, and there are 
>>relatively hard and dense woods, but are prone to fracturing (especially 
>>the hard maple).
>>
>> So when I hollow out the body of an instrument, I leave some wood proud
>on 
>> the inside (if I have the walls of the instrument hollowed to 3/16, for 
>> example, I leave a 'hill' of wood that is 1/2 to 5/8 inch thick),
>centered 
>> on the spot where the tailgut peg will go into the instrument.  I try to 
>> do a nice job of blending the extra wood in so there is no sharp corner 
>> where it would be prone to breaking off.  This has not failed me yet.
>>
>> If I am going to carve the body of this instrument, I will leave the
>area 
>> for the front axle bushing quite thick, and where the other string pins 
>> are I will leave a solid flared strip of wood proud (from the belly to
>the 
>> top) at each location.  I will probably use walnut, and inlay either 
>> padauk (yeah, I know it's not medieval, but after the orange tones down
>it 
>> looks great with walnut) or maple veneer strips to make it look as if it 
>> were glued up of 5 pieces, while maintaining the integrity of the full 
>> carved construction.
>>
>> I already have 2 soundboard blanks picked out, they are carpathian red 
>> spruce and are really pretty.
>>
>> For everyone else out there, what was the earliest example of ornate 
>> rosettes and purfling that anyone has found?  I know that cut soundholes 
>> are present in the earliest of stringed instruments, but when did they 
>> start getting really fancy?
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
>> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********
>>
>> On 2/24/2007 at 11:57 AM Karl Christoffers wrote:
>>
>>>Greetings Chris,
>>>
>>>Just for the sake of completeness sake, and since I do
>>>not think anyone else has mentioned it ...
>>>
>>>In Marcello Bono's plans packet for the Bosch
>>>hurdy-gurdy (purchased some time ago from Michael
>>>Muskett), Marcello gives the builder three options for
>>>the body of the instrument. They are: contemporary
>>>lutherie construction (with curved back and belly),
>>>carving the body out of one block of wood, and gluing
>>>up smaller blocks of wood to give the mass of a carved
>>>body without needing to start with a serious block of
>>>seasoned wood. Marcello does not give any cautions in
>>>the text to indicate there are possible problems with
>>>any of the construction options for the builder or
>>>player. I rather like the third method of gluing up
>>>the body so I would not have short grain into which
>>>the strings will be anchored at the tail of the
>>>instrument.
>>>
>>>However, since you have already carved instruments,
>>>you already know whether short grain in the tail of an
>>>instrument is a problem or not. Is it?
>>>
>>>-Karl Christoffers
>>>
>>>
>>>--- Chris Nogy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have made several hollowed bodied instruments
>>>>
>>>> www.nogy.net, look at the rebec or the crwth or the
>>>> citole or the lyre pages.
>>>>
>>>> But this instrument, the citole from the Cantigas,
>>>> is one of the design starting points I am trying to
>>>> explore, as well as King David's Crwth, the gittern
>>>> from the British Museum, etc...  These instruments
>>>> were popular and common body shapes, I assume that
>>>> it would not be out fo the question to build a gurdy
>>>> with a shape similar to other instruments that were
>>>> being built.
>>>>
>>>> I am just really curious to know if this method has
>>>> any specific design characteristics that would make
>>>> it unsuitable for a gurdy (a medieval gurdy, not a
>>>> modern one).
>>>>
>>>> I have wood in sufficient dimension and am
>>>> experienced in making a jointed body in his style as
>>>> well.  I know that if it had to be a jointed carved
>>>> body, then it would have to be jointed in 3 sections
>>>> so that the axle would have the full support fo the
>>>> center.  But for a smaller gurdy, which most of the
>>>> medieval illustrations I have seen seem to imply,
>>>> there are lots of species of hardwood that grow
>>>> large enough and can be seasoned well enough to do
>>>> this job.
>>>>
>>>> Chris
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>____________________________________________________________________________________
>>>Looking for earth-friendly autos?
>>>Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating" at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center.
>>>http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>



Reply via email to