calculate the exact positiono of the wheel for the best sound

You don't calculate it, you ask a luthier
I guess that around 18-20mm wheel centre to front edge of bridge is normal

Wheel width is another issue but in my experience not a big deal

In general as with any bowed (or plucked) instrument
Putting the wheel (bow, plucking point) closer to the bridge gives a dryer,
brighter, sharper, possibly louder sound
Putting the wheel (bow, plucking point) further from the bridge gives a
sweeter, richer,  more mellow, possibly a little quieter sound

My antique Colson HG (restored by Cali and Alden) has a narrow wheel (9mm)
quite far (26mm wheel centre to front edge of bridge) from the bridge
Is the sweetest sounding HG in many people's opinion (including Patrick
Bouffard who played it for several hours and described it as "parfait")
pic at http://www.altongate.co.uk/colson/PBColson.jpg
Colson made 2 guitar shaped models with the wheel at different spacings from
the bridge
Chris Allen has an example of each (one exacly like mine)
The key boxes have slightly different spacings also
Neither are playable unfortunately (unless anyone would like to fund the
restoration)
You can see them and my 2 (at the bottom) at
http://www.hurdygurdy.org/historical.htm

Graham

 -----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Seth Hamon
Sent: 09 March 2007 18:06
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [HG] Key placement


One of the queston's I've had is....  I know where the tangents, nut, and
chanter bridge go, but I'm still not sure how you calculate the exact
positiono of the wheel for the best sound, Seth....

Graham Whyte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  Patrick,

  The "swinging tangent" on an Equal Temperament HG only just allows the
  setting of Just Temperament
  I suspect you have not actually done it
  Tangent angles at the low end can approach 45deg
  It is normally necessary to move the nut to reduce these
  This means that the octave tangents are not at right angles
  This is not a problem
  Setting the key positions halfway between Equal and Just is a good
solution
  You can then set either temperament with minimal tangent angles

  Please don't refer to Equal Temperament as "the tempered scale"
  Almost all scales (temperaments) are tempered
  Equal Temperament is just one of several THOUSAND named temperaments
  Each of these has 12 possible root notes
  Equal Temperament is more accurately described as Twelfth Comma Meantone
  Temperament
  This means that the ratios of all the intervals in every key are identical
  Hence the name "Equal"
  Although this allows playing in all keys it does serious musical damage to
  some intervals
  In paticular major thirds are 14% of a semitone (half step) out of tune
  (sharp)
  One reason for the need to temper is that 3 sucessive pure major thirds
  don't make an octave
  Try tuning an E true to a C
  Then tune a G# true to that E
  Then tune a C true to that G#
  You will end up with a C which is almost 1/2 a semitone flat (midway
between
  B and C)
  It is the distribution of this 42 cent error called "Diesis" that is known
  as "tempering"
  Different temperaments distribute this error in different ways
  Read my paper at
  http://www.luthiers60.freeserve.co.uk/pdfs/tuningandtemperament.pdf

  Graham


  -----Original Message-----
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
  Of Patrick Brown
  Sent: 09 March 2007 00:14
  To: [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Re[2]: [HG] Key placement calculator


  Long time ago, at least as far back as fretted instruments conforming
  to the newer than fretted instruments 'tempered scale,' which
  tempered scale goes back to the ca 1600's(?) and placed in our laps
  by a fellow appropriately named Werckmeister(sp), (and fretted
  instruments going back to the 1400's or earlier, depending on where
  you were),,,derived, as Alden says, from using the 12th root of
  2,,was known as the 'Rule of 18,' which means that each successive
  distance for each next fret, or tangent, closer to the bridge one
  goes, in order to find its placement, you divide that distance by 18,
  and that resulting distance by 18, and so on ad infinitum
  (literally,,like the frog jumping halfway across the pond,,then
  halfway again). The actual number is generally agreed among luthiers
  to be 17.817, if memory serves, though I've read 17.835, but that's
  an obscure and only one or two source memory,,but 17.817 is the
  divisor, if that's the right word. The number you use to divide, at
  any rate. This is, of course, assuming you are after a tempered
  scale. If you want just temperament,,then you'd use fractions of the
  fundamental. The swinging tangent should allow either choice.

  Pat

Reply via email to