Hello R.T.        

You're right, they did. Last year there were two guys who built lutebacks, 
but they had a special agreement with Nupi Jenner. In 2000 lutebacks were 
in the regular offer but in the last years there were only boxtype-HG's on 
programm. The boxtype costs are approx. 1200.- Euros for the instrument and 
full accommodation. But you could ask Nupi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) about 
the possibility of building another type of HG.

Regards

Ernst
        
>         
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:14:33 -0800 (GMT-08:00)
> Von: "R.T. Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: Re: [HG] Symphony Plans
> 
>         Hello Ernst.
> 
> Do they also teach you how to build a lute back Vielle at these 
> workshops?
> 
> I seem to remember that he did and they they were not very expensive.
> r.t.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message----- 
> > From: Ernst Kainzmeier 
> > Sent: Jan 21, 2008 10:30 AM 
> > To: [email protected] 
> > Subject: Re: [HG] Symphony Plans 
> > 
> > Bulky?
> > 
> > Well, the dimensions are 60(without crank)x20x17cm 
> > (23.62x7.87x6.69inches), IMHO not really big. I did also build one of 
> > this box-type HG in a course at Rappottenstein-castle and during the 
> > course I got some nice comments like "...it looks like a shoe 
> > polishing toolbox..."  :o(
> > Don't let yourself be fooled about the foto: the child is Nupis 
> > daughter when she was 5 or 6! Maybe...
> > 
> > Regards
> > 
> > Ernst (Vienna/Austria)
> > 
> > 
> > @gmx.at>
> > >         -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> > > Datum: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:09:32 +0100
> > > Von: Douwe Boschma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > An: [email protected]
> > > Betreff: Re: [HG] Symphony Plans
> > > 
> > >         I understand. It is a bit bulky to my taste. I'd like to 
> > > build a smaller one
> > > as it will be primarily for my daughter. Then not too loud and big 
> > > are
> > > actually quite nice factors.
> > > 
> > > There must be some more plans around!
> > > 
> > > Greetings,
> > > 
> > > Douwe
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
>         
        
    

Reply via email to