I think it is desirable to move out of Jakarta. However, we would need to identify someone to be the HiveMind chair. I got "suckered" into that for the Tapestry TLP. I'm simply stating the fact that I don't want the job (I have too many already). So we would need to identify someone how wants/is capable of being the chair for HiveMind as a prerequisite for even discussing a HiveMind TLP.
It some ways, it would be easier to move HiveMind under the Tapestry TLP. It's not by pure chance that "all Tapestry's most rocking features derive from HiveMind". On 3/15/06, Massimo Lusetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/14/06, Achim Hügen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I don't regard hivemind as a tapestry subproject. > > It's usable standalone and not targeted at tapestry and web applications > > only. > > That's fair. > Having HiveMind as a TLP means more bureaucratic works so i guess the > deal is if anyone would like to handle that, so my choice (at least as > a first step) would be to be a Tapestry subproject rather then Jakarta > ones. > > Indeed HiveMind live very well as a standalone framework, it's simply > great, i think the most Tapestry's rocking features derive from having > HiveMind inside. > > As always my 2 cents > -- > Massimo > http://meridio.blogspot.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant Creator, Jakarta Tapestry Creator, Jakarta HiveMind Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support and project work. http://howardlewisship.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
