-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I would vote for moving outside of Tapestry. Doesn't really make much
sense to have an framework user (Tapestry) be a parent at the stage both
are at.

Can't comment on 'the chair', but I see James raised a hand. :-)


My $0.02

Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> I think it is desirable to move out of Jakarta.
> 
> However, we would need to identify someone to be the HiveMind chair. 
> I got "suckered" into that for the Tapestry TLP.  I'm simply stating
> the fact that I don't want the job (I have too many already). So we
> would need to identify someone how wants/is capable of being the chair
> for HiveMind as a prerequisite for even discussing a HiveMind TLP.
> 
> It some ways, it would be easier to move HiveMind under the Tapestry
> TLP.  It's not by pure chance that "all Tapestry's most rocking
> features derive from HiveMind".
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFEGNHYaCoPKRow/gARAn+fAKDOuYXt0mYO3r0ye8ooAsXuHm8diwCfcfym
JOFHCugkivKke7z1laB0LeI=
=7c4I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to