True it has. I can't find the site at the moment, but yes, Firefox has been improved vastly.
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 6:47 PM, Jorge Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 9:22 PM, Stephen Gigante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > It doesn't. Firefox manages it's memory exactly the way it wants to; by > > caching the back button. > > > > No, no, that's not true. It does consume a huge amount of memory caching > the > user history, but it also has many memory leaks and wastes a whole lot of > duplicated memory. > > But the good news is, a whole lot of that was fixed in FF3, which I believe > has already been released. > > -- > Jorge "Vino" Rodriguez > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders > > -- Gear Dev _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
