IRONY OVERLOAD

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Cory de La Torre <[email protected]> wrote:
> Even Toni Sergi replied, a *VALVE EMPLOYEE*, and you kept going. Men, we
> need to build additional Pylons to stop this injustice.
>
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Katrina Payne <[email protected]
>> wrote:
>
>> LOL~
>>
>> Thank you, that made my day. Now, if I just never see that picture ever
>> again
>> in my time on the internet >.>'
>>
>> ~Katrina
>>
>> On Monday, July 26, 2010 08:44:32 pm Ben Mears wrote:
>> > This is easily the most entertaining hlcoders thread I've read yet (wait,
>> > hlcoders threads are not supposed to be entertaining, hmmm..). Let me
>> write
>> > 12 paragraphs about why it is the most entertaining yet...
>> >
>> > [insert skyscraper of text here]
>> >
>> > In conclusion, this thread has degenerated into a stream of
>> > nonsense-consciousness (nonsensciousness) as exemplified by the text
>> above.
>> > Some people are arguing with some other people, but why can't we all just
>> > move along little doggies?
>> >
>> > Finalmente, I'll leave you with an inspirational poem:
>> >
>> > http://i64.photobucket.com/albums/h165/benjiwaa/thread_defused.jpg
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Bob Somers <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Geez people, this thread has run its course. Let it end.
>> > >
>> > > --Bob
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Katrina Payne <
>> > > [email protected]
>> > > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > I came to the conclusion long ago that the OP is long gone.
>> > > >
>> > > > I mostly am just posting responses to stuff directed at things I have
>> > > said,
>> > > > or
>> > > > complaints made in my direction.
>> > > >
>> > > > To which I just get more complaints.
>> > > >
>> > > > That I tend try to address--but typically they are not qualified.
>> > > >
>> > > > Then I get more unqualified and unproven claims.
>> > > >
>> > > > I mean, yes, I may be a troll here... but equally so, this has kind
>> of
>> > > > became
>> > > > Trolls Trolling Trolls.
>> > > >
>> > > > Which is why I made the irreverent joke of just collecting these
>> dolls
>> to
>> > > > try
>> > > > to lighten the mood, and defuse the situation.
>> > > >
>> > > > Though, looking at my response to this picture, and the response to
>> my
>> > > > attempt
>> > > > to defuse this...
>> > > >
>> > > > I am starting to wonder if trying to defuse a thread is ever a good
>> idea?
>> > > > It
>> > > > only seems to cause explosions.
>> > > >
>> > > > ~Katrina
>> > > >
>> > > > On Monday, July 26, 2010 06:53:38 pm Lech wrote:
>> > > > > http://i671.photobucket.com/albums/vv77/Cisdaman/Stop_posting.jpg
>> > > > >
>> > > > > This is probably a wise thing to do until the original poster
>> actually
>> > > > > has a time to digest everything, laugh and respond...
>> > > > >
>> > > > > -L
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Jonathan Murphy
>> > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > > > I already took the time out to show you an example of your
>> > > superfluous
>> > > > > > typing, please don't try to take this in circles and make our
>> point
>> > > > even
>> > > > > > more valid than it already is.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > We shouldn't have to prove anything anyway, we have much better
>> > > things
>> > > > to
>> > > > do
>> > > > > > with our time. Just know that it is true because it seems to be a
>> > > > general
>> > > > > > concensus (at least four or five people on this thread alone have
>> > > > complained
>> > > > > > about it). If you can find anyone defending your view point
>> please
>> > > > point
>> > > > > > them out to us? Otherwise, take the comments on board and adjust
>> > > > > > accordingly.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > These are my final pieces of advise to you as a long time member
>> of
>> > > > this
>> > > > > > list, please remember we are trying to help you.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Katrina Payne <
>> > > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >> I am going to assume that most of your post is surplufious
>> hypeboles
>> > > > of
>> > > > > >> inqualifiable and unverifiable claims, and you assume anybody
>> else
>> > > > does the
>> > > > > >> same
>> > > > > >> as yours.
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> Since mine are five as you say, you appear to assume that I do
>> five
>> > > of
>> > > > what
>> > > > > >> you
>> > > > > >> do.
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> As that is all I can figure out from this post--without you
>> citing
>> > > > > >> examples.
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> I know you will not however.
>> > > > > >> ~Katrina
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> On Monday, July 26, 2010 06:28:16 pm Tony "omega" Sergi wrote:
>> > > > > >> > I try to avoid these types of things but- I just can't at the
>> > > > moment.
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > The whole thing can be summed up in three sentences:
>> > > > > >> > It takes you 5 paragraphs to get your points across.
>> > > > > >> > You go off-topic about a million different things while trying
>> to
>> > > > make
>> > > > > >> one
>> > > > > >> > point, and most of the time is irrelevant.
>> > > > > >> > This is the reason that those who have spoken are complaining,
>> > > > nothing
>> > > > > >> more.
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > -Tony
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Katrina Payne <
>> > > > > >> [email protected]
>> > > > > >> > > wrote:
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > > Well, this style that you do see, that I am working to
>> adjust
>> > > out
>> > > > of,
>> > > > > >> was
>> > > > > >> > > mostly only created by these accusations of wall of text.
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> > > I am now at the point that I do not even really type:
>> > > > > >> > > * Redundant remarks
>> > > > > >> > > * Irrelevant statements (in my mind at least)
>> > > > > >> > > * Keeping each "paragraph" along a single logical step in
>> > > thought
>> > > > (if
>> > > > > >> at
>> > > > > >> > > all
>> > > > > >> > > possible)
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> > > The thing is, I have included a few other elements that
>> cause
>> > > > issues.
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> > > As I have found some people complaining about
>> wall-of-texting
>> > > tend
>> > > > to
>> > > > > >> miss
>> > > > > >> > > sentences if they are not at the start of a paragraph. To
>> point
>> > > > this
>> > > > > >> out,
>> > > > > >> I
>> > > > > >> > > tend to make these sentences their own paragraph.
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> > > Personally, I blame that in the past, accusers have
>> generally
>> > > been
>> > > > > >> fairly
>> > > > > >> > > terrible about qualifying what made my wall of text, a wall
>> of
>> > > > text.
>> > > > > >> > > Forcing
>> > > > > >> > > me mostly to guess, and adjust.
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> > > It is also these other previous issues with this, that have
>> just
>> > > > > >> generally
>> > > > > >> > > lead me to regard Wall-of-texts as not a real accusation.
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> > > Generally I do read my stuff prior to posting it. I do miss
>> a
>> > > few
>> > > > > >> things
>> > > > > >> > > due to
>> > > > > >> > > being in a rush, yes.
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> > > Though--I just noticed that in your reply to shorten my
>> > > response,
>> > > > I
>> > > > > >> appear
>> > > > > >> > > to
>> > > > > >> > > have a few newlines in odd places. I am fairly certain my
>> client
>> > > > forces
>> > > > > >> a
>> > > > > >> > > newline on my messages at column 79... though it has just
>> > > occurred
>> > > > to
>> > > > > >> me
>> > > > > >> it
>> > > > > >> > > might not--or that may somehow have an issue propagated
>> > > elsewhere.
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> > > I will note, that in threads about coding issues, I agree
>> that
>> > > > text
>> > > > > >> should
>> > > > > >> > > be
>> > > > > >> > > short. The code and comments in code should do most of the
>> > > talking
>> > > > in
>> > > > > >> > > those.
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> > > However, this, and other threads that I have gone over board
>> > > with
>> > > > the
>> > > > > >> > > others
>> > > > > >> > > in, there has been very little code applied. So what would
>> > > > normally
>> > > > be
>> > > > > >> > > present
>> > > > > >> > > in code and comments in the code, appears to be done in a
>> more
>> > > > verbose
>> > > > > >> > > manner.
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> > > Thank you
>> > > > > >> > > ~Katrina
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> > > On Monday, July 26, 2010 05:34:35 pm Jonathan Murphy wrote:
>> > > > > >> > > > Sorry, I typed it in a hurry and yes, you would probably
>> write
>> > > > > >> something
>> > > > > >> > > > completely different to what I did, it was only an example
>> of
>> > > > the
>> > > > > >> short
>> > > > > >> > > form
>> > > > > >> > > > communication that people prefer to read in a discussion
>> list.
>> > > > > >> > > >
>> > > > > >> > > > I suppose it also isn't a blanket rule, sometimes (rarely)
>> a
>> > > > wall
>> > > > of
>> > > > > >> text
>> > > > > >> > > > may be required, particularly when someone is starting a
>> new
>> > > > thread
>> > > > > >> and
>> > > > > >> > > > trying to explain the problem they are dealing with and
>> also
>> > > > when
>> > > > > >> people
>> > > > > >> > > are
>> > > > > >> > > > posting pieces of code. Just try to be as short as
>> possible
>> > > > while
>> > > > > >> > > > maintaining your point.
>> > > > > >> > > >
>> > > > > >> > > > I have the habit of reading everything I post and if I
>> realise
>> > > > I'm
>> > > > > >> not
>> > > > > >> > > > adding anything to the conversation, I cut chunks of my
>> post
>> > > out
>> > > > as
>> > > > a
>> > > > > >> > > > courtesy to the other members.
>> > > > > >> > > >
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> > _______________________________________________
>> > > > > >> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
>> > > > archives,
>> > > > > >> please visit:
>> > > > > >> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> _______________________________________________
>> > > > > >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
>> > > archives,
>> > > > > >> please visit:
>> > > > > >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
>> > > archives,
>> > > > please visit:
>> > > > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
>> archives,
>> > > > please visit:
>> > > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
>> archives,
>> > > > please visit:
>> > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
>> > > please visit:
>> > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
>> > >
>> > >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
>> please visit:
>> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
>> >
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
>> please visit:
>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Gear Dev
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
> visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
>
>

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders

Reply via email to