LOL~

Thank you, that made my day. Now, if I just never see that picture ever again 
in my time on the internet >.>'

~Katrina

On Monday, July 26, 2010 08:44:32 pm Ben Mears wrote:
> This is easily the most entertaining hlcoders thread I've read yet (wait,
> hlcoders threads are not supposed to be entertaining, hmmm..). Let me write
> 12 paragraphs about why it is the most entertaining yet...
> 
> [insert skyscraper of text here]
> 
> In conclusion, this thread has degenerated into a stream of
> nonsense-consciousness (nonsensciousness) as exemplified by the text above.
> Some people are arguing with some other people, but why can't we all just
> move along little doggies?
> 
> Finalmente, I'll leave you with an inspirational poem:
> 
> http://i64.photobucket.com/albums/h165/benjiwaa/thread_defused.jpg
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Bob Somers <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Geez people, this thread has run its course. Let it end.
> >
> > --Bob
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Katrina Payne <
> > [email protected]
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > I came to the conclusion long ago that the OP is long gone.
> > >
> > > I mostly am just posting responses to stuff directed at things I have
> > said,
> > > or
> > > complaints made in my direction.
> > >
> > > To which I just get more complaints.
> > >
> > > That I tend try to address--but typically they are not qualified.
> > >
> > > Then I get more unqualified and unproven claims.
> > >
> > > I mean, yes, I may be a troll here... but equally so, this has kind of
> > > became
> > > Trolls Trolling Trolls.
> > >
> > > Which is why I made the irreverent joke of just collecting these dolls 
to
> > > try
> > > to lighten the mood, and defuse the situation.
> > >
> > > Though, looking at my response to this picture, and the response to my
> > > attempt
> > > to defuse this...
> > >
> > > I am starting to wonder if trying to defuse a thread is ever a good 
idea?
> > > It
> > > only seems to cause explosions.
> > >
> > > ~Katrina
> > >
> > > On Monday, July 26, 2010 06:53:38 pm Lech wrote:
> > > > http://i671.photobucket.com/albums/vv77/Cisdaman/Stop_posting.jpg
> > > >
> > > > This is probably a wise thing to do until the original poster actually
> > > > has a time to digest everything, laugh and respond...
> > > >
> > > > -L
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Jonathan Murphy
> > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > I already took the time out to show you an example of your
> > superfluous
> > > > > typing, please don't try to take this in circles and make our point
> > > even
> > > > > more valid than it already is.
> > > > >
> > > > > We shouldn't have to prove anything anyway, we have much better
> > things
> > > to
> > > do
> > > > > with our time. Just know that it is true because it seems to be a
> > > general
> > > > > concensus (at least four or five people on this thread alone have
> > > complained
> > > > > about it). If you can find anyone defending your view point please
> > > point
> > > > > them out to us? Otherwise, take the comments on board and adjust
> > > > > accordingly.
> > > > >
> > > > > These are my final pieces of advise to you as a long time member of
> > > this
> > > > > list, please remember we are trying to help you.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Katrina Payne <
> > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> I am going to assume that most of your post is surplufious hypeboles
> > > of
> > > > >> inqualifiable and unverifiable claims, and you assume anybody else
> > > does the
> > > > >> same
> > > > >> as yours.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Since mine are five as you say, you appear to assume that I do five
> > of
> > > what
> > > > >> you
> > > > >> do.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> As that is all I can figure out from this post--without you citing
> > > > >> examples.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I know you will not however.
> > > > >> ~Katrina
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Monday, July 26, 2010 06:28:16 pm Tony "omega" Sergi wrote:
> > > > >> > I try to avoid these types of things but- I just can't at the
> > > moment.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > The whole thing can be summed up in three sentences:
> > > > >> > It takes you 5 paragraphs to get your points across.
> > > > >> > You go off-topic about a million different things while trying to
> > > make
> > > > >> one
> > > > >> > point, and most of the time is irrelevant.
> > > > >> > This is the reason that those who have spoken are complaining,
> > > nothing
> > > > >> more.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > -Tony
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Katrina Payne <
> > > > >> [email protected]
> > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > Well, this style that you do see, that I am working to adjust
> > out
> > > of,
> > > > >> was
> > > > >> > > mostly only created by these accusations of wall of text.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > I am now at the point that I do not even really type:
> > > > >> > > * Redundant remarks
> > > > >> > > * Irrelevant statements (in my mind at least)
> > > > >> > > * Keeping each "paragraph" along a single logical step in
> > thought
> > > (if
> > > > >> at
> > > > >> > > all
> > > > >> > > possible)
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > The thing is, I have included a few other elements that cause
> > > issues.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > As I have found some people complaining about wall-of-texting
> > tend
> > > to
> > > > >> miss
> > > > >> > > sentences if they are not at the start of a paragraph. To point
> > > this
> > > > >> out,
> > > > >> I
> > > > >> > > tend to make these sentences their own paragraph.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Personally, I blame that in the past, accusers have generally
> > been
> > > > >> fairly
> > > > >> > > terrible about qualifying what made my wall of text, a wall of
> > > text.
> > > > >> > > Forcing
> > > > >> > > me mostly to guess, and adjust.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > It is also these other previous issues with this, that have 
just
> > > > >> generally
> > > > >> > > lead me to regard Wall-of-texts as not a real accusation.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Generally I do read my stuff prior to posting it. I do miss a
> > few
> > > > >> things
> > > > >> > > due to
> > > > >> > > being in a rush, yes.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Though--I just noticed that in your reply to shorten my
> > response,
> > > I
> > > > >> appear
> > > > >> > > to
> > > > >> > > have a few newlines in odd places. I am fairly certain my 
client
> > > forces
> > > > >> a
> > > > >> > > newline on my messages at column 79... though it has just
> > occurred
> > > to
> > > > >> me
> > > > >> it
> > > > >> > > might not--or that may somehow have an issue propagated
> > elsewhere.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > I will note, that in threads about coding issues, I agree that
> > > text
> > > > >> should
> > > > >> > > be
> > > > >> > > short. The code and comments in code should do most of the
> > talking
> > > in
> > > > >> > > those.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > However, this, and other threads that I have gone over board
> > with
> > > the
> > > > >> > > others
> > > > >> > > in, there has been very little code applied. So what would
> > > normally
> > > be
> > > > >> > > present
> > > > >> > > in code and comments in the code, appears to be done in a more
> > > verbose
> > > > >> > > manner.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Thank you
> > > > >> > > ~Katrina
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > On Monday, July 26, 2010 05:34:35 pm Jonathan Murphy wrote:
> > > > >> > > > Sorry, I typed it in a hurry and yes, you would probably 
write
> > > > >> something
> > > > >> > > > completely different to what I did, it was only an example of
> > > the
> > > > >> short
> > > > >> > > form
> > > > >> > > > communication that people prefer to read in a discussion 
list.
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > I suppose it also isn't a blanket rule, sometimes (rarely) a
> > > wall
> > > of
> > > > >> text
> > > > >> > > > may be required, particularly when someone is starting a new
> > > thread
> > > > >> and
> > > > >> > > > trying to explain the problem they are dealing with and also
> > > when
> > > > >> people
> > > > >> > > are
> > > > >> > > > posting pieces of code. Just try to be as short as possible
> > > while
> > > > >> > > > maintaining your point.
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > I have the habit of reading everything I post and if I 
realise
> > > I'm
> > > > >> not
> > > > >> > > > adding anything to the conversation, I cut chunks of my post
> > out
> > > as
> > > a
> > > > >> > > > courtesy to the other members.
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > _______________________________________________
> > > > >> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> > > archives,
> > > > >> please visit:
> > > > >> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > > >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> > archives,
> > > > >> please visit:
> > > > >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> > archives,
> > > please visit:
> > > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> > > please visit:
> > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> > > please visit:
> > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> > please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, 
please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders

Reply via email to