Richard Welsh wrote:
> If you think Valve is responsible to make an anti-cheat you are
> mistaking. It is not up to Valve to make an anti-cheat.  They get no
> more money for it from anyone when they make it.

It's a good analogy, Richard, but you left out the part where the car
maker bolts their engine shut, assumes responsibility for preventing
speeding and prohibits others from doing anything more than putting up
little speed limit signs on the roads.

Valve accepted responsibility for anti-cheat technology by starting VAC.
They told Punkbuster to bugger off, and disabled a key part of HLGuard's
previous prevention methods. The community's tried to work around it,
but there's not a whole lot they can do without putting a larger burden
on a mostly clueless and lazy playerbase (i.e., Cheating-Death).

--
ironchef
http://www.dexworld.org/



_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Reply via email to