Look at the FPS though... it drops, right? And maybe the stats command stress the CPU or HLDS? :-)
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Whisper Sent: 20. mai 2005 06:05 To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re: [hlds] Re: What does RCON STATS CPU Really mean? -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Clayton the sampling might be correct, but how would that explain the results I get when I spam "rcon stats" into console and receive numbers that are all within 10% of each other? Here is exmple: 14:03:37 stats 14:03:37 CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players 86.53 73784.24 227882.64 177 6 56.87 39 14:03:38 stats 14:03:38 CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players 86.53 74690.58 228744.00 177 6 63.98 39 14:03:38 stats 14:03:38 CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players 86.77 75565.57 229665.05 177 6 35.32 39 14:03:38 stats 14:03:38 CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players 86.77 76380.45 231317.58 177 6 34.13 39 14:03:39 stats 14:03:39 CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players 86.77 77197.75 232984.47 177 6 34.13 39 14:03:39 stats 14:03:39 CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players 86.77 77256.87 234898.08 177 6 30.10 39 14:03:39 stats 14:03:39 CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players 95.31 77242.05 236992.31 177 6 26.96 39 14:03:39 stats 14:03:39 CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players 95.31 77264.55 238138.23 177 6 33.02 39 14:03:40 stats 14:03:40 CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players 95.31 77243.81 238387.27 177 6 33.04 39 14:03:40 stats 14:03:40 CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players 94.57 77214.17 238615.45 177 6 40.99 39 14:03:40 stats 14:03:40 CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players 94.57 77057.98 238889.06 177 6 34.12 39 14:03:40 stats 14:03:40 CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players 94.57 76746.83 239109.53 177 6 33.05 39 14:03:41 stats 14:03:41 CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players 94.57 76242.27 239287.92 177 6 57.57 39 14:03:41 stats 14:03:41 CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players 94.30 75778.00 238699.22 177 6 37.94 39 14:03:41 stats 14:03:41 CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players 94.30 75704.43 238780.63 177 6 60.21 39 14:03:41 stats 14:03:42 CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players 94.30 75405.64 238652.98 177 6 25.60 39 14:03:42 stats 14:03:42 CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players 93.41 75245.19 238275.91 177 6 28.43 39 14:03:42 stats 14:03:42 CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players 93.41 75358.87 238213.38 177 6 27.67 39 14:03:42 stats 14:03:42 CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players 93.41 75571.36 237885.63 177 6 28.46 39 14:03:43 stats 14:03:43 CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players 93.41 76112.34 237668.05 177 6 30.11 39 14:03:43 stats 14:03:43 CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players 89.06 76824.73 237348.69 177 6 60.34 39 14:03:43 stats 14:03:43 CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players 89.06 77527.95 237276.89 177 6 36.56 39 14:03:43 stats 14:03:44 CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players 89.06 77854.19 237533.16 177 6 46.56 39 14:03:44 stats 14:03:44 CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players 90.63 77517.18 238679.83 177 6 34.15 39 14:03:44 stats 14:03:44 CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players 90.63 77084.93 240084.63 177 6 36.57 39 14:03:44 stats 14:03:44 CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players 90.63 76791.86 241383.80 177 6 31.04 39 14:03:45 stats 14:03:45 CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players 90.63 76871.59 242368.47 177 6 22.76 39 14:03:45 stats 14:03:45 CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players 91.71 77053.85 242882.44 177 6 23.81 39 14:03:45 stats 14:03:45 CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players 91.71 77454.66 242307.06 177 6 32.04 39 14:03:45 stats 14:03:46 CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players 91.71 78062.38 240988.48 177 6 35.32 39 14:03:46 stats 14:03:46 CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players 91.71 78272.21 239666.45 177 6 32.02 39 14:03:46 stats 14:03:46 CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players 91.83 78384.60 238314.08 177 6 36.57 39 14:03:46 stats 14:03:46 CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players 91.83 78409.96 237305.31 177 6 33.04 39 Now you cannot tell me that this is not odd and that this is some sort of time sampling mismatch task manager ought to damn well show something that approximates what SRCDS is reporting back or vice versa, but it does not! On 5/20/05, Clayton Macleod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > true, but you have to sample for a certain period of time to get a > percentage reading. Obviously I'm just guessing that the period that > the game's using is shorter than the period that task manager uses, > but it would seem to make sense considering the observations. Why > would that be so hard to accept? If you're only sampling usage for 0.1 > seconds and you see a 99% value there's nothing wrong with that, even > if task manager only showed 10% usage at the same time, since task > manager samples for 1.0 seconds and it could have been idle for the > other 0.9 seconds, which would indeed mean 10% usage for task > manager's period. > > On 5/19/05, Whisper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -- > > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > > Well it is not like anybody has stepped up and stated categorically what > it > > really means and is able to explain the discrepancies between the 2 that > a > > critically thinking human being would accept. > > > -- > Clayton Macleod > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > -- _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
