-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] On 9/11/07, Peter M (Mashy) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -- > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > Agree with Wim. Vac bans will remain delayed - can't see any change to > this. > > whisper - is our (oz) experience reflected in other parts of the world - > Europe / Asia / USA etc? If not, that would count against making a > blanket > change for everyone when it is a local problem.
I already asked this specific question, read up. I understood VALVe did take action against net cafe owners who produced > multiple steam ids which were used for cheating? Has this changed? Why > isn't (if not already) valve going thru the cafe licensing system to take > care of the rogue operators where it hurts? > > > > On 9/11/07, Wim Barelds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > -- > > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > > If you make netcafe ban's instant, you'll have to make all bans instant > as > > you've already removed the advantage of delayed bans as a whole (not > > knowing > > whether a certain thing is detected). It would be better to simply ban > the > > netcafe instead. > > > -- > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > -- _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
