Hmm, we may be talking about different dialogs, but I often get a
crash dialog even with -nocrashdiag on my servers running Win2k3.
Irritating, but I haven't yet found a way to keep them from appearing.



On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 4:08 AM, Olly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is a big problem with server2008, if the server (srcds) crashes any
> script you have to restart it on crash will fail to work, because of the
> 'This program has ended unexpectedly' (or something like that).
> There is a way to turn this off in the settings, but this just shows a
> different error message. So to allow a server to finish crashing, you will
> need to remote in, and click the close button on the popup. This was getting
> to be such a problem, we went back to 2003
>
> 2008/11/24 Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> What I meant was that they are already trimmed down.  From my experience,
>> it
>> is more likely that you have too little on a server OS initially than too
>> much.  Also, like I said, I find it highly unlikely that Server 08 has a
>> higher footprint than Server 03.
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 9:32 PM, J T <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > Server OSes are really not designed to be trimmed down?
>> >
>> > You would expect a server OS to have a light memory and cpu footprint,
>> > giving more resources to the applications it will be running.
>> >
>> > On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > You are misinformed.  Windows 2008 offers no drawbacks compared to
>> 2003.
>> > > Microsoft did not give server 2008 the Vista treatment in terms of
>> > resource
>> > > usage.  Server OSes are really not designed to be trimmed down, unless
>> > you
>> > > are interested in running Server 2008 Core, which might be a good
>> option
>> > as
>> > > well.
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Midnight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > I fail to see the problem.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > > > >  With these 4 servers running total Ram usage is at %64.
>> > > >
>> > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
>> archives,
>> > > > please visit:
>> > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>> > > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
>> > > please visit:
>> > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > ---------
>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
>> > please visit:
>> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
>> please visit:
>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
> visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Reply via email to