What about negative caring?Is there a gauss plane for caring maybe?
I think most of this is covered by apathy theory.
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:29 PM, msleeper <[email protected]> wrote:

> The phrase is "couldn't care less". Please refer to this chart:
> http://www.msleeper.com/files/caring.png
>
> What the hell are you people going on about a honeypot. That doesn't
> even make sense, I don't think any of you know what that word means. I
> was refering to my feelings about the this fake server/client. Jesus,
> pay attention people.
>
>
> On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 10:20 -0700, Robert Whelan wrote:
> > tbh I could care less... I'm here for the band...
> >
> > but, if I had to guess... your probably honeypot banning and now doing
> afk bans :p
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: msleeper <[email protected]>
> > To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list <
> [email protected]>
> > Sent: Monday, June 1, 2009 2:33:03 PM
> > Subject: Re: [hlds] Vac Ban for Idle program @ Source Op?
> >
> > Anyone want to guess my opinion on the matter?
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 15:07 +0800, Shane Arnold wrote:
> > > This.
> > >
> > > I imagine the purpose of the VAC system is to stop cheats that give an
> > > unfair advantage. Idling in a server, be it by minimised official
> client
> > > or third-party client is no different. It's still idling. Not to
> mention
> > > the fact that even if VALVe wanted to design the system to block/ban
> > > this particular client, they couldn't, as the server it connects to is
> > > not VAC secure (probably for exactly that reason, they aren't
> pretending
> > > to be a legitimate way to play the game).
> > >
> > > People are creating a storm in a teacup about this, it's a very small
> > > percentage of a very large player base that use it. And even then this
> > > whole argument is a moot point, as achievements are now grindable again
> > > to gain unlocks (YAY!).
> > >
> > > /thread
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________
> > >
> > > Shane Arnold        -    [email protected]
> > >
> > > "For want of a nail, the horseshoe was lost. For want of a horseshoe,
> the horse was lost. For want of a horse, the messenger was lost. For want of
> a messenger, the message was not delivered. For want of an undelivered
> message the war was lost."
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > tgnwells wrote:
> > > > It's not really any different than running TF2 in an idling server
> and
> > > > minimizing the window, I wouldn't say it's very honest but I wouldn't
> > > > really classify it as a cheat.
> > > >
> > > > And VACs main purpose is protecting the game process, I don't think
> you
> > > > could get VAC banned from just manipulating the Steam API to perform
> > > > simple tricks like this unless you do it from within the game, while
> > > > connected to a VAC secured server. Although it seems possible if you
> > > > were to try to connect to a legitimate (VAC enabled) server using
> what
> > > > would appear to be a phony client that VAC might flag your account,
> > > > although I think it'd most likely just refuse the connection.
> > > >
> > > > On 5/31/2009 4:01 PM, SakeFox wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I really shouldn't be starting in on this since I really want this
> > > >> thread to die, but by your logic using a application to let me see
> > > >> through walls to improve my performance is no difference then using
> > > >> custom materials that let me see through wall for better
> performance.
> > > >>
> > > >> Donnie Newlove wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>> In the end the only difference between idling in your app or idling
> in
> > > >>> TF2 is RAM, CPU and if not minimized, GPU used. It's no more
> cheating
> > > >>> than running TF2 in DX8 mode to get better performance.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Cc2iscooL<[email protected]>
>  wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Seeing as it mimics idling in a server even though you're not
> idling in a
> > > >>>> server it could be considered a cheat.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> You're not actually running a game. You're using a program to
> emulate the
> > > >>>> game's function of connecting to a server. As far as I'm concerned
> that
> > > >>>> seems like cheating to me. It's like editing your punch times at
> work to say
> > > >>>> you were working when you really took the day off instead, and
> you're still
> > > >>>> getting paid. While you can't really get in trouble if you have
> nothing to
> > > >>>> do all day at work, you can get in trouble for editing your time
> sheet to
> > > >>>> say you were at work when you actually weren't.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> iGiggled
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> --
> > > >>>> Cc2iscooL
> > > >>>> Head Admin/Owner
> > > >>>> http://www.cc2iscool.com
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Philip Bembridge<
> [email protected]
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Valve: feel free to block the program, but please PLEASE after
> the weapon
> > > >>>>> drop probabilities are geared towards playing well.. similar to
> the crit
> > > >>>>> calculation!!
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> @ cc2iscool: is this program any different to sitting idle in a
> server?
> > > >>>>> then
> > > >>>>> sitting in an idle server is cheating... if so, how are you going
> to strip
> > > >>>>> their achieves? You can't strip one without stripping the other
> > > >>>>> _______________________________________________
> > > >>>>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> archives,
> > > >>>>> please visit:
> > > >>>>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>> _______________________________________________
> > > >>>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> archives, please visit:
> > > >>>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>> _______________________________________________
> > > >>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> archives, please visit:
> > > >>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> archives, please visit:
> > > >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> archives, please visit:
> > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Reply via email to