It would go against their policy to hire QA's. - They would have to have a "boss" when they are supposed to have a bossless company. - They only hire the "best" and QA isn't a very difficult job. Anyone that is considered good wouldn't be stuck doing QA. - It would bring their money per employee down. http://techcrunch.com/2011/02/15/valve-makes-more-money-per-employee-than-google-or-apple/
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Brian Simon <[email protected]> wrote: > This is why they need a Quality Assurance team. Exactly for things like > this, and for every other one of there numerous broken updates. Any decent > QA team would catch these things easily. > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 7:52 PM, wickedplayer494 . > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I imagine this is quite nightmarish for Valve. >> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Todd Pettit <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> The cure has been far worse than the affliction. :) >>> >>> >>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >>> please visit: >>> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> please visit: >> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds >> > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds
