Simple answer is if Valve open more of their own vanilla servers,
prioritise their servers on QP/MM against other non-Valve servers, and as a
result they pay for the costs of upkeep. Nobody has lost out that way,
gamers get a guaranteed experience of no plugins modifying the game in any
single way, Valve's 'image' isn't effected by any single plugin that wasn't
part of the game, need I go on further...


On 17 June 2013 00:25, Liquid Source <[email protected]> wrote:

> WOW, cry harder Supreet. If money is a problem for you may I suggest you
> get a real job instead of glomming off of other people?! Destroying the
> reputation of a company such as Valve by posting crap information to gamers
> and changing the whole game experience is just bad for business. If Valve
> decides to remove the motd functionality to keep people from tarnishing
> their image I know hundreds of server owners that will stand behind them. I
> also find your comparison of Valve to the Nazi's to be very offensive.
> Please refrain from such hate mongering. You are not the victim here, the
> people that play the game and Valves public image are.
>
> Server rules... If they are to lengthy for a chat display they
> should be on a separate webpage, so just display the url to your servers
> web page. Most game host providers offer web space with the rental of a
> game server anyway.
>
>
>
> > From: [email protected]
> > Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 19:13:10 -0400
>
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [hlds] TF2 MOTD and Quickplay
> >
> > Doctor, why don't you pay the $300-400 dedicated server bills and other
> expenses that server owners have to pay to keep their community running.
> >
> > It's as simple as this, a server forces you to see ads, leave it and
> don't come back. Why are you trying to be a Nazi government trying to
> control what server owners want to do.
> >
> > Look Valve, we pay for these servers okay. Dedicated servers aren't
> cheap, we need to make money to recovery costs. What you are basically
> doing is stunting one community's growth.
> >
> > If you continue to create features that will just add more and more
> restrictions for server owners, why don't you just become like one of the
> game publishers that don't even let users host dedicated servers.
> >
> > Just take away our server powers and how about this Valve? Why don't you
> just host all the servers for us and leave us the headache? How much extra
> server dollars will that cost you Valve, and also how much manpower will
> you need to maintain those 1000s of servers running plugins that people
> LOVE!
> >
> > It's easy for you to just toss up Vanilla servers in there with no
> configurations and setups but do realize the amount of hours and hardwork
> server owners put in their community. We build it from ground up. How would
> you like it Valve is "Example Gaming Regulation" told you, you can't push
> certain updates and release a set group of weapons and items.
> >
> > The point is this - we pay full cost for our communities, so let us do
> THINGS to cover for the cost. Otherwise, make srcds use less RAM and CPU so
> we don't have to buy expensive servers.
> >
> > I speak on behalf of many community owners who are irritated by people
> stirring up something every few weeks for no reason. Yeah I'm talking about
> you Doctor.
> >
> > Your TF2 would be NOTHING if it wasn't for us hard working community
> owners who provide great servers for your playerbase to play at.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>
>
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Reply via email to