kama wrote:
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, John Beranek wrote:



That's really very narrow minded of you...suggesting that a character set that only reliably encodes a subset of one language is sufficient.

If the charset srcds supports is UTF-8 then just use a UTF-8 console.
Simple.


Well, it might be simple to set UTF-8 as a console, but the annoying thing is when you go through the logs to see whats happend.. and all is jibberish. I rather have a ASCII-7 and live without the swedish characters, than to have all these junkchars. I already get spamed by these chars by mail... now I have to get spammed in my log files?

Why are the logs "jibberish"? With a modern Unix there should be no problem dealing with logs encoded in UTF-8 whatsoever. Have a look at http://redux.org.uk/utf8-logs.png for an example.

/Bjorn

m0gely wrote:

Yes! Even cutting and pasting some of that stuff into my initial emails was difficult. I would press SPACE after the paste and it was if I press BACKSPACE a couple times before the SPACE.

Referring to my screenshot, pasting UTF-8 into email is very difficult indeed, see:

A log with some Japanese ãããã in.

John.

--
John Beranek                         To generalise is to be an idiot.
http://redux.org.uk/                                 -- William Blake

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Reply via email to