Ian mu wrote:
Would get a big vote from me, don't see why once a week a check couldn't be done on each network for physical location and store that really alongside servers.
I was thinking along the lines of expanding location which could be provided to the client and server to be more specific e.g. in our case London, UK. Take this information and possibly combine it with automatic feedback about pings from clients, as or just before they joined servers and use it sort the returned server list.
From my understanding of the current system it sounds
like its highly likely it would return poor quality servers being hosted by home users on DSL / Cable as its basing it on numberical equivalence instead of location equivalence, is that the case? Steve ================================================ This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone +44 845 868 1337 or return the E.mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
