--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
I'm sorry, everybodys CPU is getting crushed by SRCDS.

We used to be able to run 40 player 100 tickrate CS SRCDS's on Opteron 270's
(1 SRCDS per Core) with plugins on Windows 2000 & 2003

We are now running 20 player 66 tickrate CS SRCDS's on the same hardware
with only some Matties scripts and Metamod.

You guys on Linux seem to be suffering even more than us Windows guys, but
never the less, everybody is hurting regardless of hardware/OS combinations.

Sorry

On 3/24/07, Deacon - Digital Gaming eXtreme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks Whisper.  I used your server guide for my base configs and then
> tweak them a bit for my Core3 servers.  I'm just having a hard time
> accepting that a dual opteron is getting crushed.
>
> Next question, does anyone have any suggestions for systems/OS?
>
> On a side note, I did use taskset to set CPU affinity.  While the choke
> was still present the game did seem to run a bit nicer.  I noticed that
> studder/rubber band lag was reduced.
>
> -D
>
>
> Whisper wrote:
> > --
> > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> > DoD is a HLDS based game and tickrate 33 doesn't apply (At least I hope
> it
> > doesn't apply in your case)
> > DoD:S is a Source based game and the default tickerate is 66. Most CS:S
> > servers effectively default to 66 tickrate as well, since 33 tickrate
> has
> > proven to be a quite horrible end user experience.
> >
> > On 3/24/07, Deacon - Digital Gaming eXtreme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks. So the next question is, how bad will the DOD and DODS servers
> >> perform w/ tickrates of 33?
> >>
> >> -D
> >>
> >> Samuel Collinson wrote:
> >>
> >>> Increasing the kernel refreshrate will only put more load on your
> >>> server. You will need to either decrease the number of slots you are
> >>> serving or decrease the tick/ticrates for the servers.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Deacon - Digital Gaming eXtreme wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I agree w/ that.  The question is, is there a way to reduce CPU usage
> >>>> w/o affecting game play?  Would a 1000 Hz kernel help here or would I
> >>>> only gain a small amount of CPU back?  Compared to new processors the
> >>>> Opti 246s aren't the best, but they are work horses that usually do
> the
> >>>> job.  That being said, has anyone else run more then 3 32 slot
> DODS/DOD
> >>>> servers on the same machine and if so, did they lag?
> >>>>
> >>>> On my connection, DSL 6.0/768, I usually have less than 5 choke, but
> w/
> >>>> a good spike I see 25+.  Also, players complain that their scoreboard
> >>>> ping is over 200 when all servers are full.  Overall I don't think
> the
> >>>> boxes are performing that bad seeing as their procs are both over 90%
> >>>> used, but the end users have issues so I have to address them.
> >>>>
> >>>> -D
> >>>>
> >>>> Ian mu wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> >>>>> Looks to me from the cpu usage you're probably overloading them.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 3/23/07, Deacon - Digital Gaming eXtreme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> My servers lag.  It doesn't get more simple than that.  This has
> >>>>>> been an
> >>>>>> on-going issue w/ my systems for some time now and I'm turning to
> the
> >>>>>> community for assistance.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I'm running Fedora Core 3 (2.6.12-1.1381_FC3smp #1 SMP) with my Hz
> >>>>>>
> >> set
> >>
> >>>>>> to 500 (or so it appears).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system--
> >>>>>> ----cpu----
> >>>>>> r  b   swpd   free   buff  cache   si   so    bi    bo   in    cs
> >>>>>> us sy
> >>>>>> id wa
> >>>>>> 1  0    112 160480 129556 842064    0    0     4     0    4     2
> >>>>>> 50  4
> >>>>>> 46  0
> >>>>>> 2  0    112 160480 129556 842064    0    0     0     0 7704   *557
> >>>>>>
> >> *89
> >>
> >>>>>> 7  5  0
> >>>>>> 3  0    112 160480 129556 842064    0    0     0     0 7728   *555*
> >>>>>>
> >> 90
> >>
> >>>>>> 5  5  0
> >>>>>> 3  0    112 160480 129556 842064    0    0     0    32 8008   *501*
> >>>>>>
> >> 91
> >>
> >>>>>> 6  3  0
> >>>>>> 16  0    112 160604 129556 842324    0    0     0     0 7507
> >>>>>> *479* 93
> >>>>>> 6  2  0
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> My servers are:
> >>>>>> Dual Opteron 246
> >>>>>> 10K HDD
> >>>>>> 2 GB RAM
> >>>>>> 100 Mbps NIC
> >>>>>> Layered Tech and EZZI.net data centers.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The main server I'm worried about runs the following games:
> >>>>>> 2 x 32 DODS (Mani Admin Plugin v1.2BetaR,, MetaMod:Source v1.3d,
> >>>>>> Stripper v1.1a, Valve Anti-Cheat, SteamBans SouRCe v2.4)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 1 x 32 DOD (LogMod v0.8.0.0, ChickenMod v1.4, AMXMODX v1.75a,
> MetaMod
> >>>>>> v1.19p28, Valve Anti-Cheat, SteamBans SeRVer v3.4)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 1 x 20 Dystopia v1.1 (Valve Anti-Cheat)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> For the servers I'm running:
> >>>>>> sys_ticrates/ticrate of 66
> >>>>>> heapsize of 131072 (256*512).  I've also used 262144 (512*512).
> >>>>>> fps_max 300
> >>>>>> sv_maxrate 25000
> >>>>>> sv_maxupdaterate 66
> >>>>>> sv_minrate 500
> >>>>>> sv_minupdaterate 10
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I'm looking at load average: 4.20, 4.20, 4.26 <--- wicked high
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Cpu0  : 91.8% us,  2.3% sy,  0.0% ni,  2.0% id,  0.0% wa,  0.7% hi,
> >>>>>> 3.3%si
> >>>>>> Cpu1  : 93.8% us,  3.6% sy,  0.0% ni,  2.3% id,  0.0% wa,  0.0% hi,
> >>>>>> 0.3%si
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 17992 USERNAME   15   0  261m 151m  14m S 55.7  7.5   6363:04
> >>>>>> srcds_amd
> >>>>>> 25064 USERNAME   15   0  255m 143m  13m S 54.1  7.1 857:40.21
> >>>>>> srcds_amd
> >>>>>> 1795 USERNAME   16   0  181m 104m  11m R 47.9  5.2 282:
> 33.47srcds_amd
> >>>>>> 9831 USERNAME   16   0  184m 172m 9328 R 34.4  8.5 186:12.78hlds_amd
> >>>>>> 9833 USERNAME   15   0  184m 172m 9328 S  0.3  8.5   0:23.55hlds_amd
> >>>>>> <-- I hate that this always appears
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> For server mgmt I'm using TCAdmin.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I see other servers running multiple games on the same machine, but
> >>>>>> I'm
> >>>>>> curious if my HW is the problem or if it is a config issue.  Any
> >>>>>> thoughts on what the issue might be?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> Deacon (Not Eric)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> >>>>>>
> >> archives,
> >>
> >>>>>> please visit:
> >>>>>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> >>>>> archives, please visit:
> >>>>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> archives,
> >>>> please visit:
> >>>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> >>> please visit:
> >>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> >> please visit:
> >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> >>
> >>
> > --
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>
--

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Reply via email to