This is already done with DBlocker and multithreaded: http://dblocker.didrole.com/
The multithreading only works on Windows though, as Valve disabled the CPU detection code on Linux, so it's just like the servers always start with -threads 1. If you got a linux server you can add the -threads command and it will work though. 2011/8/26 Saint K. <sai...@specialattack.net> > I can recall from the hlds times that we used to have an anti-wall hack > extention or plugin which was quite low on load. What it did was it simply > didn't send any information about clients that were not visible from your > point of view. Can't figure out what the name was though, it was one of the > high used tools (hlguard or so perhaps?) > > Saint K. > ________________________________________ > From: hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com [ > hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Nilsson [ > daniel.joki...@gmail.com] > Sent: 26 August 2011 13:36 > To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Dealing with F2P ban evasion and status hack? > > Why does command like sv_cheats exist? > > Remove it > > //Daniel > > Eric Riemers skrev 2011-08-26 13:33: > > I think they could do even more, but in the end the impact on servers on > > cpu (anti wallhack for instance) might be that high and since its still > > single threaded.... > > > > On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:32:29 +0200, "AnAkIn ."<anakin...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Valve could block wallhacks and speedhacks with some server side code if > >> they wanted to. > >> > >> 2011/8/26 Kigen<theki...@gmail.com> > >> > >>> There isn't just that. But I mentioned it since it was what was being > >>> discussed. > >>> > >>> A lot of things get broken in cheats when you use this plugin. > >>> > >>> But it does cause some other issues (small, but noticeable). > >>> > >>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 9:05 PM, J M<invaderam...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> The client doesn't decide it, but it knows when it's going to happen > > at > >>> the > >>>> same time the server does. This is so that client side prediction can > >>> work > >>>> effectively with crits. Whether an attack is a crit is decided by both > >>> the > >>>> server and the client at the same time. They used to allow clients to > >>> decide > >>>> it, and crit hacks used to be much more useful. Nowadays, crit hacks > >>> simply > >>>> shoot every time there is going to be a crit, instead of forcing crits > >>> every > >>>> time you shoot. > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Necavi<nec...@0xf.org> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Out of curiosity, why should the client decide when a critical hit > >>> occurs? > >>>>> I can see some benefit to it, but mostly I see it as exploitable. > >>>>> > >>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>> From: hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com [mailto: > >>>>> hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of hlds > >>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 17:07 > >>>>> To: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list > >>>>> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Dealing with F2P ban evasion and status > >>>>> hack? > >>>>> > >>>>> Valve should first add some basic server side protection against some > >>>>> common hacks. > >>>>> > >>>>> For example should be easy to block "100% crits" hacks like this one: > >>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4hq_LZUPvqI. I understand why the > >>>>> client > >>>>> has to decide when a a critical hit occurs, but the server should > >>> validate > >>>>> the decision. > >>>>> > >>>>> Most speedhacks also should be detected by server. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- > >>>>> From: bottige...@gmail.com > >>>>> Sent: 08/25/11 11:36 PM > >>>>> To: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list > >>>>> Subject: [hlds_linux] Dealing with F2P ban evasion and status hack? > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Is Valve really doing anything to catch people making F2P accounts to > >>>>> avoid cheat bans? > >>>>> > >>>>> Ever since we switched to IP bans, we've been able to catch many > >>>>> cheaters using F2P to avoid bans. Some of them have even made up to 4 > >>>>> accounts in a row. Unfortunately, I've started to see some of these > >>>>> people sprinkle our ban system with dynamic IPs which will inevitably > >>>>> ban innocent users. > >>>>> > >>>>> We've also recently dealt with another hacker here (Valve can confirm > >>>>> they use the same IP address). > >>>>> > >>>>> http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198047123732 - primary > >>>>> cheating > >>>>> account > >>>>> http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198038410008 > >>>>> > >>>>> What was unusual about this is that he was using a name copy program > >>>>> and the admin at that time was complaining he couldn't use the status > >>>>> command. Is it possible to have the status command blocked somehow? > >>>>> The cheater in question posted this youtube video on this hack forum. > >>>>> > >>>>> http://casualhacks.net/forum/showthread.php?t=69 > >>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > > archives, > >>>>> please visit: > >>>>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > >>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > > archives, > >>>>> please visit: > >>>>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > > archives, > >>>>> please visit: > >>>>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > >>>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > >>> please visit: > >>>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > >>>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > >>> please visit: > >>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > >>> > > _______________________________________________ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > -- Best regards, AnAkIn, ------------- ESL EU TF2 Admin http://www.esl.eu/eu/tf2 _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
