Well, they can't really roll back now. It's Friday, and we all know what happens with Friday updates :P
Kyle. On Feb 17, 2012 8:12 AM, "ics" <[email protected]> wrote: > I understand having 2 duplicate systems made into one and have options > like other games and items from other games to be traded between players > but what i don't understand is why much faster and reliable than the > current system was removed before the system was made more convenient and > faster? Players will get used to the current one too but that's not the > point. If you wanted to do a quick trade, that was it. Now it just takes > too long. Shoudl have kept the old intact untill things were ready to be > released to wider audience. > > -ics > > 17.2.2012 17:55, AnAkIn . kirjoitti: > >> I prefer the Steam trading system. >> >> 2012/2/17 hlds<[email protected]>: >> >>> We had two trading mechanism, one being fast and quite reliable (if we >>> can >>> use this word for something related to Steam/TF2), while the other >>> allowing >>> advanced trades (more than 8 items + trading games etc...), but being >>> slow >>> and failing many times. Now we have only one. I didn't know that >>> removing a >>> feature used by many players is a good thing... >>> >>> I understand Valve's point of view (is easier to maintain and improve one >>> mechanism instead of having two), but why is this "a good thing" for >>> others? >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: >>> hlds_linux-bounces@list.**valvesoftware.com<[email protected]> >>> [mailto:hlds_linux-bounces@**list.valvesoftware.com<[email protected]>] >>> On Behalf Of doc >>> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 4:44 AM >>> To: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list >>> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Mandatory Team Fortress 2 Update Released >>> >>> For every complaint that gets filed I'd like to vote FOR steam >>> overlay/inventory trading. I think it's a good thing and more >>> importantly: >>> haters gotta hate. >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Frank<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> To be honest I was expecting a roll-back to at least the Option of >>>> having >>>> in-game trade overlay returned. >>>> Can someone at least reply if this is being looked at after all the >>>> opposition and complaints its gotten? >>>> >>>> On another note glad to see the client crashes fixed and the server >>>> >>> restart >>> >>>> requests..very much appreciated! >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>> >>> ______________________________**_________________ >>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >>> please visit: >>> https://list.valvesoftware.**com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/**hlds_linux<https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux> >>> >> >> >> > > ______________________________**_________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > https://list.valvesoftware.**com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/**hlds_linux<https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux> > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
