Thnx for that, seem to have missed it back then.
>________________________________ > From: Ross Bemrose <[email protected]> >To: Mart-Jan Reeuwijk <[email protected]>; Half-Life dedicated Linux server >mailing list <[email protected]> >Sent: Friday, 8 June 2012, 16:51 >Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] sv_lan only looking at 192 for a private network > >This is from last year on the subject of IPv6: > >On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Milton Ngan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Just to let everyone know. I am currently working on deploying >IPv6 network infrastructure for Valve's network. This is not a promise >that support is coming, but rather to point out that without this >infrastructure it is very difficult to implement IPv6 support. > > Until last year, none of our network equipment would support IPv6. >Our network providers also don't have pervasive IPv6 support, at least >not on par with IPv4. So there are some technical challenges that we >face with regards to network resiliency, which makes it risky for us >to use in a production environment. > > Like many of you on this list, I am passionate about adopting >IPv6, but it isn't something that is going to happen overnight. My >goal is to support IPv6 with the common applications (e.g mail, web, >DNS) within the next 12 months. However, with some of our appliances, >it is clear that IPv6 support is still a long way off which will make >this goal a challenging target. > > M. > >On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Mart-Jan Reeuwijk <[email protected]> wrote: >> http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/events/world-ipv6-launch/ >> >> I'm more concerned on IPv6, not seen any on this from valve. >> >> >>>________________________________ >>> From: Saul Rennison <[email protected]> >>>To: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list >>><[email protected]> >>>Sent: Friday, 8 June 2012, 13:03 >>>Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] sv_lan only looking at 192 for a private network >>> >>>Most likely not :( >>> >>>However it would be quite simple to code your own sv_lan using SourceMod. >>> >>> >>>Kind regards, >>>*Saul Rennison* >>> >>> >>>On 8 June 2012 11:57, Steven Miano <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello Mailing List, >>>> >>>> Will there ever be consideration for Class B and Class A LAN settings for >>>> sv_lan 1? >>>> >>>> At the moment when a server administrator chooses to use sv_lan 1 this is >>>> what is displayed on the console: >>>> >>>> sv_lan >>>> "sv_lan" = "1" ( def. "0" ) >>>> - Server is a lan server ( no heartbeat, no authentication, no non-class C >>>> addresses ) >>>> >>>> >>>> Which seems to proclude the other two types of private LAN segments (10 >>>> dots or 172 dots). This also has the effect that when a player is in the >>>> server browser and they use the LAN tab, they don't see the servers on >>>> their 10. or 172. local area networks. >>>> >>>> Is there any hope that these other private networks ( >>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_network) will ever get included in >>>> the >>>> sv_lan option? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> ~mianosm >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >>>> please visit: >>>> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >>>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >>>please visit: >>>https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> please visit: >> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > >-- >Ross Bemrose > > > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
