I'm glad we decided to take the high road here and didn't resort to calling
each other scumbags based on how they want to run their video game server :)


On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:28 AM, dan <needa...@ntlworld.com> wrote:

> On 21/02/2013 16:44, Essay Tew Phaun wrote:
>
>> Cry about it, Dan. The bans were reversed for a reason.
>>
>
> It's moot, read between the lines of what Fletcher said and you'll see
> they will stop the flow of quickplay players
> to  servers that do it.
>
>
> "Sounds like we need to adjust our quickplay heuristics, seeing that it
> creates this perverse optimal strategy for server operators to get traffic."
>
> Clearly you don't understand this. He's not saying the problem is with
> quickplay at all.
>
> He is calling the server operators actions perverse.
>
> It means they know you are a bunch of scheming gits but they figure they
> can stymie your scumbag behaviour without having to outright ban you.
>
> Personally I think that's a mistake. Once a scumbag, always a scumbag.
>
> Just remember that the next thread you see with folk moaning about
> quickplay players not appearing on their servers.
>
> --
> Dan
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> https://list.valvesoftware.**com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/**hlds_linux<https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux>
>



-- 
- Gordon Reynolds
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Reply via email to