Maybe a better option would be to make a hobo on linux VM? Everything preinstalled and setup so that someone can just jump into coding.
Downside is maintaining it. Upside is it gets would-be developers familiar (somewhat) with using it on linux (which, most likely, will be where they end up deploying their completed app). Thoughts? On Jan 12, 7:36 pm, Matt Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > I noticed that the Rapid Rails instructions have users installing 1.9 > on Windows - is this *really* a good idea? I just saw this: > > http://railslab.newrelic.com/2010/01/07/state-of-the-stack-a-ruby-on-... > > which shows < 2% uptake in production deployment for the 1.9 series. > Given that both 1.9 and Windows are known for causing weird issues > with plugins, wouldn't it be better to install a stable version > (1.8.7, for instance) to avoid driving new users crazy? > > Just wondering... > > --Matt Jones
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hobo Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en.
