You have a point, but I haven't had any issues myself. I can put the old instructions back in as well, and add a warning label to the new. ; -).
On 1/12/10, Matt Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > > I noticed that the Rapid Rails instructions have users installing 1.9 on > Windows - is this *really* a good idea? I just saw this: > > > http://railslab.newrelic.com/2010/01/07/state-of-the-stack-a-ruby-on-rails-benchmarking-report-7-january-2010 > > which shows < 2% uptake in production deployment for the 1.9 series. Given > that both 1.9 and Windows are known for causing weird issues with plugins, > wouldn't it be better to install a stable version (1.8.7, for instance) to > avoid driving new users crazy? > > Just wondering... > > --Matt Jones > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Hobo Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<hobousers%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en. > > > > -- Thanks, Owen Owen Dall Barquin International 410-991-0811--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hobo Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en.
