I would think so on the cloud images. Started to say maybe even a cloud image wrapped in an ubuntu server (has cloud support with same api as EC2) but then thought that might be too much overhead and give a bad experience from a performance standpoint.
On Jan 18, 4:31 am, Owen <[email protected]> wrote: > Kevin, > > Sorry I missed your post about a Linux VM. We have a standard VM that > we clone at USDA, which includes JBoss and JRuby that we could share, > and a standard Xen VPS we use at Slicehost. > > Would it be useful to also have an Amazon EC2 and Rackspace Mosso > image with Hobo preinstalled? > > -Owen > > On Jan 13, 1:21 pm, kevinpfromnm <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Maybe a better option would be to make a hobo on linux VM? Everything > > preinstalled and setup so that someone can just jump into coding. > > > Downside is maintaining it. > > Upside is it gets would-be developers familiar (somewhat) with using > > it on linux (which, most likely, will be where they end up deploying > > their completed app). > > > Thoughts? > > > On Jan 12, 7:36 pm, Matt Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I noticed that the Rapid Rails instructions have users installing 1.9 > > > on Windows - is this *really* a good idea? I just saw this: > > > >http://railslab.newrelic.com/2010/01/07/state-of-the-stack-a-ruby-on-... > > > > which shows < 2% uptake in production deployment for the 1.9 series. > > > Given that both 1.9 and Windows are known for causing weird issues > > > with plugins, wouldn't it be better to install a stable version > > > (1.8.7, for instance) to avoid driving new users crazy? > > > > Just wondering... > > > > --Matt Jones > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hobo Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en.
