+1 I was going to respond with a similar note but Lee beat me to it.
I have never heard of a WG adopting a non-existant draft soon to be published..... Don On 9/19/11 1:03 PM, "Howard, Lee" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Ray and I expect Tim's first version to be published very soon, and if >>the >> WG has no objection we'd like to see that identified as >>draft-ietf-homnet...00 >> by the end of the month so as to have a solid base to work with before >>the >> homenet interim meeting on October 6 and 7. > >Sorry, I'm unclear on what you're asking us not to object to. I don't >object to >naming a document whatever you want. Or are you saying that sometime >soon, a draft will be published, and if there are no comments fast >enough, it >will be adopted as a WG item? I don't think it works that way. > >Lee > >This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable >proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to >copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely >for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you >are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified >that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in >relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly >prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in >error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the >original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout. >_______________________________________________ >homenet mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
