>>>>> "Roger" == Roger Jørgensen <[email protected]> writes:
Roger> Minor issue and not sure if it's in the scope, however, the
Roger> first question I get from almost all that are new to IPv6 are
Roger> why do we need more than one /64, why will/should there be
Roger> more than one LAN at home? Some of them are fairly technical
Roger> to.
There already is more than one layer-2 at home. It's just that they are
connected together (poorly, and unidirectionally) by NAPT. Sometimes
the NAPT is intentional, but most of the time it is not.
Roger> And (maybe) another scenario, can we assume all home networks
Roger> will/should (not) communicate with each other? The fridge
Roger> with the TV or the computer, power/lights with the TV. I can
If we start with an architecture that assumes it is possible for all
networks to communicate, then it is *far easier* to then write policies
to prevent unwanted interactions, once we have a way to name the end
points in question.
--
] He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life! | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
then sign the petition.
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
