correcting myself after pressing enter a bit too fast... On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Roger Jørgensen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 2:19 AM, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> "Roger" == Roger Jørgensen <[email protected]> writes: > <snip> >> Roger> And (maybe) another scenario, can we assume all home networks >> Roger> will/should (not) communicate with each other? The fridge >> Roger> with the TV or the computer, power/lights with the TV. I can >> >> If we start with an architecture that assumes it is possible for all >> networks to communicate, then it is *far easier* to then write policies >> to prevent unwanted interactions, once we have a way to name the end >> points in question. > > Make perfect sense in my head yes :-)
Make sense to do it in that order yes:) -- Roger Jorgensen | [email protected] | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | [email protected] _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
