On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 2:19 AM, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> "Roger" == Roger Jørgensen <[email protected]> writes: <snip> > Roger> And (maybe) another scenario, can we assume all home networks > Roger> will/should (not) communicate with each other? The fridge > Roger> with the TV or the computer, power/lights with the TV. I can > > If we start with an architecture that assumes it is possible for all > networks to communicate, then it is *far easier* to then write policies > to prevent unwanted interactions, once we have a way to name the end > points in question.
Make perfect sense in my head yes :-) -- Roger Jorgensen | [email protected] | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | [email protected] _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
