I'm trying to do a somewhat complete requirements and pro/con analysis for IPv6
routing in a small network, the obvious examples being residential and SOHO
networks. What I have in pixels at this instant is:
<section title="Contestant protocols">
<t></t>
<section title="Routing Information Protocol">
<t></t>
</section>
<section title="Open Shortest Path First Routing Protocol">
<t></t>
</section>
<section title="IS-IS Routing Protocol">
<t></t>
</section>
<section title="Border Gateway Protocol">
<t></t>
</section>
<section title="Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks">
<t></t>
</section>
<section title="Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing">
<t>
Can you say "DYMO"?
</t>
</section>
<section title="Optimized Link State Routing Protocol">
<t></t>
</section>
</section>
For some of these, the obvious comment is "YMBK". Some will feel that their
selection is the obvious given and will be able to go on at some length as to
why, and may be surprised to find that people disagree with them.
I'd like to do several things:
(a) make the list as reasonably complete as possible consistent with openly
documented protocols,
(b) provide a reasonably complete and objective analysis of each as I can,
(c) identify the key reasons one would choose each - if there is a reason at
all, and
(d) identify the key reasons one would not.
What I don't want to accomplish is deep-six these lists and half a dozen others
in arguments.
Do me a favor. Let's do this in private mail. If you think of a protocol I
should mention that I haven't, let me know. If you think there is a really good
argument for or against any of them in particular, let me know. If you think
I'm nuts - I already know that, you don't need to remind me :-)
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
